A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great BritainJohnson, Rossiter
History
A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great Britain
Johnson, Rossiter
United States -- History -- War of 1812
The action lasted but twenty-five minutes. Seven hundred of the British
were killed, fourteen hundred wounded, and five hundred prisoners. The
Americans lost four killed and thirteen wounded; in the entire campaign,
three hundred and thirty-three.
The force under Thornton, on the western bank of the river, carried the
American works, where but brief resistance was made, and were pursuing
the retreating militia, when news of the disaster on the other bank was
brought to Thornton, together with an order to return. He had lost a
hundred men, killed or wounded, and inflicted a loss of but six.
The 9th was spent, under an armistice, in burying the dead and caring
for the wounded. General Lambert then determined to withdraw to the
shipping and abandon the enterprise, but was ten days about it, during
which time his troops were annoyed by incessant cannonading by day
and "hunting parties" by night. The British fleet had entered the
Mississippi at its mouth, and from the 10th to the 17th bombarded Fort
St. Philip, seventy-five miles below New Orleans, but effected nothing,
and on the 18th withdrew. {346}
CHAPTER XXI. PEACE.
{346}
_The Treaty of Ghent--Treatment of Prisoners--Losses and Gains by the
War--Conclusion._
|Had there been an Atlantic cable, or even a transatlantic steamer, with
land telegraphs, in those days, the slaughter before New Orleans might
have been prevented; for a treaty of peace had been signed at Ghent
on the 24th of December, 1814. It made the usual stipulations for the
exchange of prisoners and the return of property, guaranteed peace to
the Indians, and provided for a settlement by commissioners of questions
as to boundary and the islands in Passamaquoddy Bay,--and it provided
for little else. The negotiations had been going on for five months,
and more than once were in danger of being broken off on account of the
insolent and supercilious bearing of the English Commissioners. So says
Adams in his diary.
At the outset, the British Commissioners had insisted that the Indians
should have a territory set off to them, as neutral ground between the
British and the American possessions, and that the United States should
have no armament on the great lakes {347}and no fortifications on their
shores, while Canada was not to be restricted. On the other hand, the
American Commissioners had insisted on formal abrogation of the right of
search and impressment. But all these points were ultimately given up.
As early as June the American Commissioners had been instructed by
the President that they might omit any stipulation on the subject of
impressment, if it was found indispensably necessary to do so in order
to terminate the war; and acting under this instruction they yielded to
the argument that, as Europe was now at peace, there was no longer any
occasion for exercising the right, and therefore no practical necessity
for mentioning it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account