A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great BritainJohnson, Rossiter
History
A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great Britain
Johnson, Rossiter
United States -- History -- War of 1812
General Pike, when his wound was found to be mortal, was borne off to
the fleet. A little while afterward the British flag that had floated
over York was brought to him. He asked to have it placed under his head,
and in a few minutes calmly expired. He was but thirty-four years of
age, but had performed valuable services for his country, especially in
the command of two exploring expeditions, one about the headwaters of
the Mississippi, and the other in what is now western Louisiana and
Texas--of both of which he published accounts. {105}The war-vessel that
the Americans expected to capture at York had left the harbor two days
before their arrival. The troops abandoned the place, and on the 1st of
May were taken again on board the fleet, which as soon as the weather
would permit, on the 8th, sailed away. In this expedition the loss of
the American land forces was fourteen killed and twenty-three wounded,
besides those who suffered from the explosion of the magazine. In the
fleet, seventeen men were killed or wounded. The British regulars lost
sixty-two killed and ninety wounded; the loss of the Indians and militia
was unknown.
Two episodes of this battle have been discussed with considerable
warmth. The first is the explosion of the magazine. It is not certain
that this was done purposely. General Sheaffe, in his report, attributed
it to "an unfortunate accident," but two English historians speak of it
with commendation as a regularly laid plan. American writers who condemn
it have done so on the ground that, as the commanding General had
made arrangements for a surrender, the place was virtually surrendered
already, and he therefore had no farther right to destroy life or even
property. Commodore Chauncey probably gave the correct view of the
matter when he wrote: "I'm much inclined to believe that General Sheaffe
was correct when he stated that it was accidental. {106}Nor could I
condemn the enemy, even if a train had been laid. It is a perfectly
legitimate mode of defence, as every student of history knows; and why
should we censure the garrison for thus employing an acknowledged means
of defence, to check the progress of an invader?" If the surrender had
not virtually taken place, it is difficult to see why the defenders
of the town are to be any more blamed for firing a stone wall at their
enemy than they would have been for firing a thousand bullets.
The other point discussed is the burning of the government buildings.
They were undoubtedly set on fire, though without orders from
headquarters. It was said that the soldiers were incensed at finding a
human scalp--presumably that of an American, taken by some Indian, and
sold to the British authorities for the proffered premium--hanging on
the wall of the legislative chamber. This scalp and the Speaker's mace
were sent to Washington, where the British troops found them when they,
in turn, burned our government buildings a little more than a year
later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account