A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great Britain — John Shaqi
A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great BritainJohnson, Rossiter
History
A History, of the War of 1812-15 Between the United States and Great Britain
Johnson, Rossiter
United States -- History -- War of 1812
In the early European wars of this century, the days of paper
blockade--a blockade which consists merely in a proclamation, without
the presence of armed vessels to enforce it--were not yet over, and on
May 16th, 1806, England declared the whole coast of the Continent, from
Brest to the mouth of the Elbe, to be in a state of blockade. Napoleon
retaliated by issuing from Berlin a counter decree, dated November
21st, 1806, which declared the entire coast of Great Britain to be under
blockade, and prohibited any vessel which sailed from a British port
from entering a Continental port. England then, by orders in council,
published November 17th, 1807, prohibited all neutral trade with France
and her allies, except in vessels that had first entered a British port.
As paper and ink were cheap, and {013}by this time so little was left of
the rights of neutrals that it was hardly worth while to regard them at
all, Napoleon tried his hand at one more decree. Under date of Milan,
December 17th, 1807, he proclaimed that any vessel which should submit
to search by British cruisers, or pay any tax to the British Government,
should be forfeit as good prize.
These so-called measures of retaliation--which became famous as the
"orders in council," and the "Berlin and Milan decrees"--had very
little effect upon the people who were at war, but they laid some of the
heaviest penalties of war upon the one maritime nation that was at
peace with all. Instead of resorting to war at once, the United
States Government, being as well able as any other to issue a foolish
proclamation, laid an embargo, December 22d, 1807, upon all shipping
in American ports, prohibiting exportations therefrom. This measure
met with violent opposition in New England, which was more largely
interested in commerce than any other part of the country. The coast of
New England presented innumerable harbors, and her forests were full of
the finest ship-timber, while in agriculture she could not compete
with the States having richer soils and a less rigorous climate.
Cotton-spinning was in its infancy, and the manufactures that were to
employ her water-powers had not been {014}developed. She naturally and
properly looked to the carrying trade as her best means of livelihood.
The orders in council and the Berlin and Milan decrees imposed great
risks and unjust restrictions upon it, but did not altogether destroy
it; the embargo suppressed it at once.
In March, 1809, Congress repealed the embargo, and substituted a system
of non-importation and non-intercourse with France and Great Britain.
Voyages to their dominions, and trade in articles produced by them, were
prohibited; but it was provided that whenever either of those nations
should repeal its decrees against neutral commerce, the restriction
should be removed as to that nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account