case in England in which St. Peter and the power of the keys did good
duty for the Church of Rome. The result of this discussion turned the
scales from Irish to Roman Christianity as the religion of England.
King Oswy had, before the synod met, held the Celtic views. His son, who
was present, held the Roman views. The result of this discussion led to
serious changes in the Church of England, for in the same year, A.D. 664,
the archbishopric of Canterbury became vacant, and Kings Oswy and Egbert
sent to Rome Wighard, an Englishman, whom they appointed, there to be
consecrated archbishop by the Pope, because there was no metropolitan in
England to perform this duty of consecration. He died there, and then the
Pope was empowered by the same kings to select and consecrate a suitable
person himself. “We have not been able,” writes Pope Vitalian, “now to
find a man docile and qualified in all respects to be a bishop according
to the tenor of your letter.”[60] Again, “King Egbert, being informed by
messengers that _the bishop they had asked of the Roman prelate_ was in
the kingdom of France.”[61]
From these two quotations, it is beyond all doubt or question that the
English kings did ask the Pope to select a qualified person for the see
of Canterbury. And it is absurd for Protestant writers, such as Soames,
in the face of these quotations, to assert that Theodore’s appointment
was a piece of skilful manœuvring on the part of the Pope. It was nothing
of the sort. It is but reasonable to assume that when Wighard died in
Rome, Vitalian wrote at once and informed the English kings of the event,
and that they then, although we have not their letters, asked the Pope
to choose a man for them. He therefore consecrated Theodore, a Greek by
birth and education. We all know what followed. In the same year the Pope
conferred on Theodore the “supremacy over all England.”[62] He landed in
England in 669, and held his see for twenty-one years. The Churches of
the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms were independent of each other up to the arrival
of Theodore, who had energetically worked to unite all the Churches under
the metropolitan power of Canterbury. Here then we are on solid ground.
The Pope’s supremacy over all the Churches in England dates from the
archiepiscopate of Theodore.
There is no reference to tithes from the publication of Theodore’s
“Penitential,” probably about A.D. 686, until the two legates came to
England in 787, or a period of one hundred years, Archbishop Boniface
of Mentz, writing to Archbishop Cuthbert between 746 and 749, refers
to tithes having then been received by English bishops, “In daily
offerings,” he says, “and tithes of the faithful, they receive the milk
and wool of the sheep of Christ, but they take no care of the Lord’s
flock.” [“Lac et lanas ovium Christi oblationibus cotidianis ac decimis
fidelium suscipiunt; et curam gregis Domini deponunt.”[63]] Here is an
early instance of endowed bishops neglecting their flocks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account