A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth; Mourt's Relation: A Relation or Journal of the English Plantation settled at Plymouth in New England, by Certain English adventurers both merchants and others
History
A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth; Mourt's Relation: A Relation or Journal of the English Plantation settled at Plymouth in New England, by Certain English adventurers both merchants and others
Massachusetts -- History -- New Plymouth, 1620-1691; Pilgrims (New Plymouth Colony) -- Early works to 1800
[85]The adventures of Samoset, Squanto, and other Indians who had been
kidnapped and taken to Europe before whites settled in New England
are recounted with accuracy and appropriate color by Carolyn T.
Foreman, _Indians Abroad_, 1493-1938 (Norman, 1943).
[86]Presumably a misprint for _Williams_. There is no other mention of a
Williamson in the early Plymouth sources.
[87]This first American mutual security pact remained inviolate
throughout Massasoit’s life. He and his eldest son Wamsutta (named
“Alexander” by the English) signed such a treaty in Plymouth in
1639, and it was ratified and confirmed by the colonial government.
The peace was broken in 1675, for which most historians blame
Wamsutta’s brother and successor, Metacom (“King Philip”).
[88]deep
[89]mulberry
[90]The journey to Pokanoket took place in the summer of 1621. During
the preceding three months, which are unreported in this journal,
Bradford notes that almost half of the settlers died in the “General
Sickness.” None abandoned the enterprise, however, and the
_Mayflower_ returned empty to England.
[91]The derivation of this name is not clear. Six different spellings
occur even within this book: _Plimoth, and New Plimoth_ (both on the
title page!), _Plimouth_, _Plimmouth_, _New Plimmouth_, and _New
Plimmouth_. It is true that Plymouth was the town from which the
settlers had finally set sail from their native country, “... having
been kindly entertained and courteously used by divers friends there
dwelling.” Furthermore, the land company which granted their patent
had once been called the Plymouth Company. But we need evoke neither
sentimentalism nor commercial diplomacy on the part of the Pilgrims
to account for the name. In fact, this site was called “Plimouth” on
the map which they carried on the _Mayflower_, from Capt. John
Smith’s _Description of New England_ (London, 1616); supposedly it
was arbitrarily so designated by Prince Charles when Smith showed
him a draft of the map.
[92]Now, Middleborough, Massachusetts.
[93]Now, the Mount Hope area of Bristol, Rhode Island.
[94]cultivate; till
[95]admirably
[96]The wife of James I had died more than a year before the Pilgrims
sailed from England.
[97]fatigued; bruised
[98]Now, Barnstable, Massachusetts.
[99]Now, Eastham, Massachusetts.
[100]Now, Chatham, Massachusetts.
[101]In early seventeenth-century usage, this could imply anything from
disarming to kidnapping, from robbing to killing.
[102]small keg
[103]This passage defies interpretation. “Or Lemes” has no sense in
seventeenth-century English or local Indian languages. Most previous
editors have assumed this to be a misprint for _our allies_; I am
not altogether happy with that interpretation but have nothing
better to offer.
[104]Bradford’s _Of Plymouth Plantation_ sets the date of this
embarkation as 18 September 1621.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account