A Letter to John Wilkes, Esq; Sheriff of London and Middlesex: In Which the Extortion and Oppression of Sheriffs Officers, With Many Other Alarming Abuses, Are Exemplified and Detected; and a Remedy ProposedHolloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
History
A Letter to John Wilkes, Esq; Sheriff of London and Middlesex: In Which the Extortion and Oppression of Sheriffs Officers, With Many Other Alarming Abuses, Are Exemplified and Detected; and a Remedy Proposed
Holloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
Crime; Extortion; Freedom; Sheriffs
It may be thought, Sir, that the fertility of my invention supplies the
chasm of bailiffs knavery, and that to indulge an unjustifiable spleen, I
have given my veracity a stretch; indeed there is no occasion for
fiction, I have a most plentiful stock of substantial, well-attested
infamy to cull materials from, and can produce many men who have gone
through this ceremony step by step, with this variation only, that the
scope of villany has been more extensive, and the catastrophe protracted
to a longer date. Things are strongly misrepresented if a certain
bailiff of Middlesex did not extort bills to the amount of 3000l. from
one man in the afore-mentioned situation. But if these transactions,
infamous as they are, were the ultimate of their villany, I should hold
them so barren of vice as not to merit censure. Acts of a more alarming
and cruel nature are daily practised by these BUCCANEERS and HUSSARS of
law; I shall therefore overlook these as supernumerary artifices,
bagatelles, and common garnish to their standing household dish of
villanies, and proceed to a view of their integrity in the execution of a
legal process levied on the effects of a defendant.
The first step in this business is putting from two to any _requisite_
number of their own _worthies_ in possession, not to preserve the
property, but to swear that no such property existed, if necessary. The
goods are generally taken off the premises without the _tedious_ form of
appraisement, inventory, or bill of sale from the sheriff; nor is the
difference between the sum levied and the amount of the property any
obstruction, these are niceties to be determined by law. Taking ALL the
property they find is, in the Bailiff Dictionary, securing the ammunition
to prevent A FIRING; the English of which is, robbing a man of ALL will
prevent his having any thing left to procure redress. The burglary thus
completed, the plunder is appraised by the FAMILY broker, and as formally
sold to another _honest_ chapman in the FAMILY way. If the injured party
should fortunately raise a friend to inquire into the nature of this
atrocious robbery, what avails it! the matter comes before the
court—affidavits innumerable _prove_ the legality of the whole
transaction, and the oppressor triumphs in victorious villany. Yet a man
of common understanding will answer, how is it possible these
depredations can be committed with impunity, in the face of such
excellent laws? I reply, that the excellency of those laws, and their
favourable interpretation by our judges, &c. renders it almost
impracticable to come at offenders of this class. Whilst affidavits can
be procured at the stinted price of half a crown, to weigh in testimony
against such as are the language of truth, dictated by conscience only,
we have little hopes of redress for injuries of this stamp, as the
complaint must be made by motion on affidavit, and the reply is made in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account