A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common Informers — John Shaqi
A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common InformersHolloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
History
A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common Informers
Holloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
Gambling
In stating this transaction, I wish it to be understood, as a mere sample
of the virtuous conduct of Mr. Bell upon a variety of occasions, too
numerous for any thing like a detailed accuracy, which, however, bids
fair to undergo an ample discussion at the next Surry assizes, if he has
audacity enough to pursue the action, there to be tried, and if what is
stated in the defendant’s brief is true, it exhibits a catalogue of
outrageous atrocity unparalleled in the history of human turpitude.
With respect to Mr. Bell’s cotemporaries in the traffic of similar
extortions, they are about twenty-five in number, but as many of the
magistrates are, and the rest soon will be, furnished with a complete
list of their names and descriptions, and as they are perfectly known to
the generality of my readers, it is unnecessary to enlarge upon their
conduct, the more especially as there is great probability that from the
example indignant justice calls for, upon the heads of these selected for
prosecution, the rest may benefit by their fate, and substitute some
other means of existence, more particularly that portion of the catalogue
composed of attornies, of whom I shall say no more at present than that
the profession will suffer no material indignity whenever an halter or
any other accident sweeps from its bosom, those _superfluous ornaments_
of the roll. I shall, therefore, content myself with personifying a
gentleman who may fairly be called the prolific parent of perjury, or
nest-egg of iniquity; if I am right in his name, and I think I need not
guess twice, to nick it once, it is John Barnes Hart; (next in order for
prosecution) this reptilised miscreant has, perhaps, trained more
wretches to eminence in infamy than any other man that makes plunder a
science; it is true that he cannot swear himself, for upon the evidence
of the pillory about 20 years ago, an act of divorce passed between his
lips and the Holy Evangelists; he now pays his religious salutations to
the new testament by proxy. This wretch has been drummed out of all the
courts of law, and from the presence of the magistrates to the beat of
the “Rogue’s March.” He now contents himself with leading his
instruments of infamy to the doors of Justice, where, like a brutal
butcher, he turns in Towzer to the bloody work, waiting without to
receive a report of the success of his pious instructions, the effects of
which generally end in obtaining a warrant from the Magistrate, to
accomplish some disastrous scene of corruption. If any thing can
mitigate the attrocious conduct of this man, it is the melancholy
consideration that many others imitate it. But to draw to a conclusion,
what will Magistrates say?—what will mankind at large say?—and what will
be their execrations of the transactions I have here stated, when they
are told, that out of at least 100 indictments and process by
Magistrate’s warrants, within these ten years past, not more than half a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account