A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common Informers — John Shaqi
A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common InformersHolloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
History
A Letter to Sir Richard Ford and the Other Police Magistrates: Upon the Prevalancy of Gaming, and the Infamous Practices of Common Informers
Holloway, Robert, active 1771-1808
Gambling
To enter into an accurate history of the unbounded passion for gaming in
all ages, and in all countries, and to recount the severity of those laws
which have from time to time been enacted to restrain the evil, would be
a work of more labour and time than I wish to devote to the subject, or
indeed, than is necessary on the present occasion.
It is clear that the ruinous rage for gaming is not confined to this
country, for history affords us too many proofs to establish a contrary
conclusion.
The vice is not even confined to Europeans; for such is the unquenchable
thirst for gaming in China, and such its melancholy effects, that they
not only play for all the property they possess, but afterwards stake
their wives and children, which are detained by the winner till they are
redeemed. Their games are much the same as the Europeans, Hazard,
Pas-dice, &c. &c.
With respect to the Italians, from the highest to the lowest, historians
inform us they all manifest an inordinate passion for every species of
gaming, and when they lose all they have, will stake themselves against
so many dollars as the market goes at, for the price of slaves; and if
they lose, are sold by the winner to the Gallies, and spend their lives
at the oar, under a rigorous and cruel discipline, without a murmur.
The late excellent Judge Blackstone, and indeed many other authors, tell
us that the antient Germans would also stake their persons against
certain sums of money, and if they lost, would think it a disgrace not to
become the slaves of the winner.
The Greeks and Romans were incurably addicted to gambling, the nature of
which seems to have borne great similarity to that in most general use in
this country, especially the games with dice thrown out of a box, the
same as is practised at the Hazard tables with us.
Notwithstanding the severity of the Roman laws forbidding the use of
dice, they paid little or no attention to the prohibition; nor indeed did
they confine themselves to the rules of probity and fairness in the
games, inasmuch that the art of cogging the die appears to be a laudable
exertion of skill. Thus Dryden makes a Roman gamester exclaim:
“But then my study was to cog the dice,
And dext’rously to throw the lucky size;
To shun the ace that swept my stakes away,
And watch the box, for fear they should convey
False bones, and put upon me in the play.”
From which it appears that the art of introducing false dice was not
unknown, but practised by the Romans; nor did the passion for gaming
cease with the imbecility of age, for when they were passed all manual
exercise they constantly indulged themselves with dice, a custom which
Dryden has also satyrised in the following lines:
“If gaming does an aged sire entice,
Then my young master swiftly learns the vice,
And shakes in hanging sleeves the little box and dice.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account