A letter to the Rev. Charles N. Wodehouse, Canon of Norwich, occasioned by his recent publication, entitled, "What is the meaning of Subscription?": with a few observations on the speech &c. of the Lord Bishop of Norwich, on Subscription — John Shaqi
A letter to the Rev. Charles N. Wodehouse, Canon of Norwich, occasioned by his recent publication, entitled, "What is the meaning of Subscription?": with a few observations on the speech &c. of the Lord Bishop of Norwich, on SubscriptionCampbell, Charles
Religion
A letter to the Rev. Charles N. Wodehouse, Canon of Norwich, occasioned by his recent publication, entitled, "What is the meaning of Subscription?": with a few observations on the speech &c. of the Lord Bishop of Norwich, on Subscription
Campbell, Charles
Church of England -- Liturgy; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles; Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse), 1790-1870. What is the meaning of subscription?
Let my disclaiming of a purposed evil
Free me so far in your most generous thoughts,
That I have shot mine arrow o’er the house
And hurt my brother.—
In which light, as a Clergyman of the Church of England, I hope long to
have the opportunity to consider you, believing as I do, that your
scruples, though the creations of a _conscientious_ mind, are more
imaginary than substantial—and with this persuasion and in that hope, I
beg to subscribe myself,
Very faithfully yours,
CHAS. CAMPBELL.
* * * * *
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GOWING, PRINTER, SWAFFHAM.
FOOTNOTES.
{1} Mr. Wodehouse’s Letter to the Bp. of Llandaff, p. 69.
{2a} Cure of Church Div. Direct. 48, Pt. 3.
{2b} Mr. Wodehouse, p. 50.
{3a} p. 4.
{3b} p. 35.
{3c} p. 4.
{3d} p. 35.
{5a} p. 67.
{5b} p. 26.
{6a} Petition with explanations, p. 31, published 1832.
{6b} p. 81.
{7a} p. 30.
{7b} p. 43.
{8} p. 54.
{9a} Letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, p. 63.
{9b} p. 45.
{11} Article 1.
{13} p. 41.
{14a} Petition of 1833.
{14b} Ordination Sermon, 1838.
{15a} Heber’s Life of Jeremy Taylor, p. cv.
{15b} p. 82.
{15c} p. 81.
{15d} p. 84.
{16} p. 4.
{19} Epist. Ded. to Sermon on the opening of Parliament.
{21} My readers may wish to know who the ADELPHI are to whom I have more
than once alluded. They are the authors of a pamphlet, entitled
“Observations on a Petition, (the Petition of last Session), for the
Revision of the Liturgy, &c. written by two brothers, a Clergyman and a
Layman.”
These brothers, by the impetuosity of their onslaught, are said to be
distinguished amongst the petitioners as the CASTOR and POLLUX of their
little phalanx.
And as there are in their pamphlet some things which might render
questionable the logical acumen of the one, and tend to cast a shadow of
suspicion on the orthodoxy of the other—they have acquired credit for no
indifferent tact in putting forth this SIAMESE sort of production,
inasmuch as to any sentiment which might not be thought creditable to the
divine; the barrister is ready with fraternal consideration to assert his
claim,—“MEUS HIC sermo est,” and that which might not be highly esteemed
for its soundness in the learned and honourable society of Lincoln’s Inn;
the divine with reciprocal affection is at hand, to exclaim—“Adsum qui
feci”—in short, the Barrister will be responsible for the divinity, and
the Divine for the points of law.
Diligat et semper socius te sanguinis illo
Quo pius affectu Castora frater amat.
{22a} p. 113.
{22b} p. 107.
{24a} Bishop of Norwich Pamph. p. 18.
{24b} Sparrow’s Collection, &c. p. 12.
{25a} Bp. of Norwich’s Pamph. p. 18.
{25b} Hart’s Eccl. Records, p. 2.
{26a} Burnet Pref. vol. i.
{26b} Sparrow’s Collection, &c. p. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account