A Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, A.M.: How far the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council commits the Church of England by its decision, even allowing it to have jurisdiction in points of doctrine — John Shaqi
A Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, A.M.: How far the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council commits the Church of England by its decision, even allowing it to have jurisdiction in points of doctrineMayow, Mayow Wynell
Religion
A Letter to the Rev. William Maskell, A.M.: How far the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council commits the Church of England by its decision, even allowing it to have jurisdiction in points of doctrine
Mayow, Mayow Wynell
Baptism -- Church of England; Church and state -- Church of England; Church and state -- Great Britain; Ecclesiastical law -- England -- History -- 19th century; Gorham, George Cornelius; Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee
No doubt there is much difference between our case here, and
that in the analogy we have been using. p. 18The State
can, beyond all question, take up its doubtful matter, and
re-word it, in another meaning, too plain to be denied. The
Church (among us) alas! has no freedom of speech: no direct power
of action; no immediate method by which to correct the
ambiguity.
But nevertheless she must do all she can, according to the
means she has, or she will not be clear in this matter; and the
most evident of all the steps for her to take is at once, and in
earnest, and with her whole heart, to petition the throne to be
permitted to meet in convocation to take these points into
practical consideration. If she do all she can, she
will not be to be judged, that she can do no more; but at any
rate, I think any one of us may, nay every one of us should,
suspend our judgment as to her being committed to heresy until we
see what it is she will do.
Having gone thus far in considering our position and duties, I
will venture a little further, (I trust without presumption
offering it merely as a suggestion,) to state what appears to me,
the first actual step to be taken.
Though as a Church we cannot meet in synod until called
together by the Crown, yet as Englishmen, as mere subjects of the
empire we may meet and petition the throne that convocation may
be licensed to deliberate upon the momentous questions which now
affect the Church. As soon then as conveniently may be
after the decision of the Privy Council shall be given, (and I
may as well say here, that it appears to me to make very little
practical difference as to the necessity of such a step, whatever
that decision may be:) as soon then as conveniently may be after,
a meeting should be called in London of all persons clerical and
lay alike, who desire to see a freer action p. 19of the
Church, for this one specific purpose to address the throne
praying her Majesty graciously to concede to the troubled hearts
and perplexed consciences of so many of her subjects, that
convocation may be summoned for dispatch of business. The
day should be carefully chosen: that it be not too soon nor too
late: not too soon for it to be thoroughly and widely known, and
for all who may be anxious to be present to make their
arrangements accordingly; not too late, so as to beget any
suspicion of lukewarmness. The Archbishop of Canterbury or
the Bishop of London, should unquestionably with all duty and
reverence be asked to preside; and all our Right Reverend Fathers
in God, be requested to give us their help and blessing in this
endeavour. All Churchmen who feel in these dangerous days
it would be a great comfort and advantage to hear the
Church’s voice distinctly indicating the course to be
pursued, within any reasonable reach of that gathering, ay, and
beyond it, would, it is to be hoped, attend. No extraneous
matter should be gone into, and if possible the speaking, (at
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account