A Life for a Life, Volume 2 (of 3)Craik, Dinah Maria Mulock
General
A Life for a Life, Volume 2 (of 3)
Craik, Dinah Maria Mulock
Fiction
“By bidding him an eternal farewell, allowing him to get killed, and
then dying on his tomb?”
Everybody laughed. Treherne said he was thankful his Lisa was not of
her sister's mind.
“Ay, Gus dear, well you may! Suppose I had come and said to you, like
Dora's heroine, 'my dear boy, we are very fond of one another, but we
can't ever be married. It's of no consequence. Never mind. Give me a
kiss, and good-bye,'--what would you have done, eh, Augustus?”
“Hanged myself,” replied Augustus, forcibly.
“If you did not think better of it while searching for a cord,” drily
observed Mr. Charteris. (I have for various reasons noticed this
gentleman rather closely of late.) “Dora's theories about love are
pretty enough, but too much on the gossamer style. Poor human nature
requires a little warmer clothing than these 'sky robes of iris woof,'
which are _not_ 'warranted to wear.'”
As he spoke, I saw Miss Johnston's black eyes dart over to his face in
keen observation, but he did not see them. Immediately afterwards she
said:--
“Francis is quite right. Dora's heroics do her no good--nor anybody;
because such characters do not exist, and never did. Max and Thekla,
for instance, are a pair of lovers utterly impossible in this world.”
“True,” said Mr. Charteris, “even as Romeo and Juliet are impossible,
Shakspere himself owns=
````'These violent delights have violent ends.'=
Had Juliet lived, she would probably not by force, but in the most
legal, genteel, and satisfactory way, have been 'married to the
County;' or, supposing she had got off safe to Mantua, obtained
parental forgiveness, and returned to set up house-keeping as Mrs.
R. Montague; depend upon it she and Romeo would have wearied of one
another in a year, quarrelled, parted, and she might, after all,
have consoled herself with Paris, who seems such a sweet-spoken,
pretty-behaved young gentleman throughout. Do you not think so, Doctor
Urquhart? that is, if you are a reader of Shakspere.”
Which he apparently thought I was not. I answered, what has often
struck me about this play, “that Shakspere only meant it as a tale of
boy and girl passion. Whether it would have lasted, or grown out of
passion into love, one need not speculate, any more than the poet
does. Enough, that while it lasts, it is a true and beautiful picture
of youthful love--that is, youth's ideal of love. Though the love of
maturer life is often a far deeper, higher, and better thing.”
Here Mrs. Treherne, bursting into one of her hearty laughs, accused
her sister of having “turned Doctor Urquhart poetical.”
It is painful to appear like a fool, even when a lively young woman is
trying to make you do so. I sat, cruelly conscious how little I have
to say--how like an awkward, dull clod I often feel--in the society of
young and clever people, when I heard her speaking from the other end
of the table--I mean, Miss Theodora.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account