A military dictionary : $b or, Explanation of the several systems of discipline of different kinds of troops, infantry, artillery, and cavalry: the principles of fortification, and all the modern improvements in the science of tactics: comprising the pocket gunner, or little bombardier, the military regulations of the United States: the weights, measures, and monies of all nations: the technical terms and phrases of the art of war in the French language: particularly adapted to the use of the Duane, William
History
A military dictionary : $b or, Explanation of the several systems of discipline of different kinds of troops, infantry, artillery, and cavalry: the principles of fortification, and all the modern improvements in the science of tactics: comprising the pocket gunner, or little bombardier, the military regulations of the United States: the weights, measures, and monies of all nations: the technical terms and phrases of the art of war in the French language: particularly adapted to the use of the
Duane, William
English language -- Terms and phrases; Military art and science -- Dictionaries
This book, no way calculated to teach the initiatory exercises, nor to
give an idea of the combined manœuvres of larger bodies; nor any method
of instruction, nor the duties of any other body than an infantry
battalion, was improperly dignified with the name of a _system_. The
most elevated in power as well as the most subordinate in military or
militia duty, adopted this false notion of a system, without enquiring
further than that it was established. When such a tract was held forth
as sufficient by the authority of law and by the silent indifference
of those who knew or ought to know better, it is not at all surprizing
that every other object of military study was neglected, since every
other was announced to be superfluous.
This state of general indifference or unacquaintance with the business
of war, gave rise to the American _Military Library_; in which the
editor intended originally to have comprehended a _vocabulary of
military terms_; and had made so much progress in its preparation,
as to discover that it would make a large book, and that any thing
short of a minute and comprehensive Dictionary, would be leaving the
undertaking still incomplete. The general _want_ of knowlege on the
subject, the inaccuracy of the notions which prevailed, and above all
the great revolutions which modern times had produced in the whole
economy and ordination of military science, decided the editor upon
the necessity of rendering the undertaking as complete as practicable,
by giving to the public a competent book of reference, so necessary to
study in the acquisition of every species of knowlege.
After some numbers of the Library had been published, the French
Military Dictionary of 1768, and the English Military Dictionary of
major James, fell into the editor’s hands. These works rendered much of
what had been already done superfluous, though not entirely useless;
the French work had been antiquated long before the revolution, by
the changes which took place in the French establishment in 1788 and
1791, and still more by the total renovation which it underwent during
the revolution. The English Dictionary labored under difficulties
of another nature; adapted to England alone, the military system of
England, called by the name of Dundas, which was only a modification
of the Prussian system of Saldern, and the French system formed in
imitation of the Prussian after the seven years war, must necessarily
be to a British officer the standard of a work published for the
British army; accordingly, although major James, both from his fine
understanding and experience, was well acquainted with the defects of
that system, he was still under the necessity of making it his standard.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account