A military dictionary : $b or, Explanation of the several systems of discipline of different kinds of troops, infantry, artillery, and cavalry: the principles of fortification, and all the modern improvements in the science of tactics: comprising the pocket gunner, or little bombardier, the military regulations of the United States: the weights, measures, and monies of all nations: the technical terms and phrases of the art of war in the French language: particularly adapted to the use of the Duane, William
History
A military dictionary : $b or, Explanation of the several systems of discipline of different kinds of troops, infantry, artillery, and cavalry: the principles of fortification, and all the modern improvements in the science of tactics: comprising the pocket gunner, or little bombardier, the military regulations of the United States: the weights, measures, and monies of all nations: the technical terms and phrases of the art of war in the French language: particularly adapted to the use of the
Duane, William
English language -- Terms and phrases; Military art and science -- Dictionaries
These natural and often useful passions must, nevertheless, be
restrained like all others within the bounds of reason; and, in order
to avoid the danger which may flow from our prejudices, we must
endeavor to consider our own circumstances with eyes as dispassionate
as we should those of strangers. We must enquire, what was the state
of military knowlege in the armies of the invaders; whether they
exhibited any of the great qualities which constitute well disciplined
troops or great generals; whether the whole course of their military
transactions was not a series of blunders, produced by their ignorance
of our people and country; and even in a great degree owing to the want
of talents in the officers of the enemy, to supply by their genius and
spirit of enterprize, the disadvantages under which they labored. It
would require only an enumeration of a few facts to shew, that although
the patience with which the American troops endured hardships and
privations, afford glorious examples of the military virtues; that even
these great virtues, conducted as they were, by a general who united in
himself the military qualities of a Fabius and a Scipio, could not have
had so much success were it not for the want of a good discipline, and
the utter incapacity of the generals of the British army.
In the modern wars of the French revolution, the like truths have
been demonstrated as in the American contest. The British armies had
been merely taught the duties of parade, and when they came into
the field, had to learn by hard fighting and severe defeats, that
their officers were generally ignorant of the art of war; for they
were beaten once more by _raw troops_ ably conducted to the field
by experienced officers, who possessed skill, who had made military
science their study; and, above all, who knew how to take advantage of
the incompetency of the British leaders.
Mankind in every country, educated in the same way, varies very
little in those points which are adapted to military services. It
must, therefore, in a great measure depend upon the education which
is applied to military affairs, in the discipline of armies, whether
they are victors or vanquished. All nations profess to have acted upon
this opinion, though there seems not to be that attention paid to the
subject, nor to education of any kind, which the acknowleged importance
of the case calls for. This indifference or heedlessness has at times
infected all nations, and may be considered as a disease, which if not
cured at a certain stage, ensures destruction.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account