Custody of children -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- 20th century -- Fiction; Women -- Fiction
Margaret turned to the lawyer who still held the paper in his hand. "You
see I am very ignorant of legal terms," she said, with a pitiful little
attempt at apology,--"I have never had anything to do with the law--and
I do not quite understand what 'custody' means here. Is it that Mr. De
Jarnette is by this codicil appointed Philip's guardian--to take care of
his property?"
The attorney did not look up from the papers he was fingering. Indeed,
as she looked from one to another in her perplexity Margaret saw only
averted faces. There was not one that was ready to look into her
anxious, pleading eyes.
"Mrs. De Jarnette," said the attorney, moistening his dry lips, "this
means something more serious than that, or rather it would if Mr. De
Jarnette were inclined to insist upon the letter of the law--which, of
course, he will not do--" with a rather imploring glance in the
direction of the gentleman referred to. Mr. De Jarnette sat unmoved and
immovable, not showing by the change of a muscle that he heard the
appeal, and the lawyer went on. "Custody in this sense does not mean the
guardianship of property, but of the person."
There was another silence. Then Margaret,--eyes staring, breath coming
hard, hands clenched, and face white as death, spoke.
"Do you mean," she said slowly and in a voice that trembled with
suppressed passion, "that my child has been willed away from me?--from
me--his mother? That this man--or any man--can have the right by law to
take him from me?... _My baby?_... Oh, no! you don't mean this!... I was
mad to think of it. But you see--I am so inexperienced."
"But, Mrs. De Jarnette," returned the lawyer, feeling his task harder
even than he had feared, "I am obliged to tell you--much as I regret to
do so--that it is true. There is a most unfortunate law in this
District--not to call it by a harsher name--which gives a father the
right to will away his child even from its mother. That law your late
husband unfortunately knew about, and in a moment of great anger, and,
as he claimed, of great provocation, he used that knowledge as we have
seen."
"To stab the woman he had sworn to cherish," muttered Judge Kirtley,
under his breath. Then, reaching for the will, he asked, sternly, "Were
all the requirements of the law complied with in regard to witnesses?"
"Yes, sir. I am sorry to say that nothing has been omitted that would
give validity to the will--or rather to this codicil."
"Then I am constrained to say," blurted the Judge, "that it was a
dastardly thing!"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account