I have scarcely anything to add to the statements in my former volume. These organs consist of the true ovaria, or glandular bodies seated on each side, not far from the basal edge of the labrum; of the main or unbranched ovarian ducts; and of the (Pl. 25, fig. 1, _g_) ovarian branching tubes and cæca. I traced distinctly in Balanus, Tetraclita, and Coronula, the two main ovarian ducts, running from within the prosoma to the layer of inosculating, branching, ovarian cæca[48] which overlie the basis. In _Coronula diadema_ one of these main ducts was 1/100th of an inch in diameter. Though I traced these ducts near to the grape-like, glandular masses,[49] which I cannot doubt are the true ovaria, I did not succeed in tracing them into actual connection. As in the Lepadidæ, these ovarian glands lie on the sides, near the basal margin of the labrum, and almost under, but rather to the outside of the antennular nerves. The branching and inosculating ovarian cæca form a layer, which corresponds with the mass filling up the peduncle in the Lepadidæ. In Tetraclita they do not cover the whole basis, but are confined to the circumference; they, however, likewise extend up between the two layers of corium round the walls of the shell, and chiefly in the interspaces between the depressor muscles of the opercular valves. In Chelonobia, they enter between the radiating septa in the thickness of the walls: in _Coronula diadema_, they extend from over the basal membrane into the six large square chambers (Pl. 16, fig. 7, _v_) separating the radii and alæ: in Tubicinella they are confined to the basis: in Xenobalanus, they form a layer over the basis and likewise round the upper part of the peduncle-like body, which answers to the shell of other sessile cirripedes. [48] These are well described in Lepas, by R. Wagner, in 'Müller's Archiv,' 1834, p. 467. Von Siebold, I observe, refers to Burmeister as the first author who discovered the ovarian cæca within the peduncle; I had thought that M. Martin St. Ange had a prior claim. [49] These are obscurely figured by Karsten ('Nov. Act. Acad. Cæs. Nat. Cur.,' 1845, Pl. 20, fig. 1_d_) as salivary glands; they were so considered by Cuvier and M. Martin St. Ange: I may observe that salivary glands have not been positively recognised in any Crustacean.