A new system of chemical philosophy, Volume 2, Part 1Dalton, John
Science
A new system of chemical philosophy, Volume 2, Part 1
Dalton, John
Atomic theory; Chemistry, Inorganic
The truth is, these important experiments shew that in elastic fluids
the increments of temperature are not proportional to the whole heat,
compared with the like increments of temperature and whole heat in
those bodies when in the liquid and solid states.
The specific heats of bodies, it is well known, are determined by means
of the relative quantities of heat necessary to raise the temperature
of those bodies a certain number of degrees. They are expressed by the
ratios of those quantities. If the capacities of the same bodies for
heat were permanent at all temperatures, then these ratios would also
express those of the whole quantities of heat in bodies. In fact, most
authors represent the specific heats as expressing both the ratio of
the total quantities of heat in bodies, and of the relative quantities
to raise their temperature a given number of degrees; but it is the
latter only which they accurately represent, and the former only
hypothetically.
In regard to bodies in the solid and liquid forms, all experience
shews that their capacities for heat are nearly if not accurately
constant within the common range of temperature; it seems therefore
not unreasonable to infer that the whole quantity of heat in each is
proportional to their increments. When, however, a solid body by an
increase of temperature assumes a fluid form, and absorbs heat without
any increase of its temperature, its total quantity of heat is thus
increased; and it is contended by the writers on capacity, that the
increments of heat afterwards are increased in the same proportion
as the total quantities. This is probable enough; but it ought to be
proved in several instances by direct experiment before it can safely
be admitted as a general principle; more especially now since the
analogy in the case of a liquid becoming an elastic fluid is found to
fail in this particular. As an instance of uncertainty, the capacity
of ice to water has been found as 9 to 10 by one person, and as 7.2 to
10 by others; such wide difference in the results shows there must be
a difficulty in determining the specific heat of ice, and that it may
even be doubted whether the specific heat of ice or water is greatest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account