A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)Bryant, Jacob
History
A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)
Bryant, Jacob
History, Ancient; Mythology
not be understood? and which of the two are we in this case to believe,
Herodotus or Plutarch? I do not mean that I give any credence to the story
of Alcmena and her tablet: nor do I believe that there was a tripod with
characters as antient as Amphitryon. I only argue from the principles of
the Greeks to prove their inconsistency. The Pheneatæ in Arcadia shewed to
Pausanias an inscription upon the basis of a brazen statue, which was
dedicated to [1065]Poseidon Hippius. It was said to have been written by
Ulysses, and contained a treaty made between him and some shepherds. But
Pausanias acknowledges that it was an imposition; for neither statues of
brass, nor statues of any sort, were in use at the time alluded to.
It is said of Cadmus, that he introduced the rites of [1066]Bacchus into
Greece. But how is this possible, if Bacchus was his descendant, the son of
his daughter Semele? To remedy this, the latter mythologists suppose, that
there was a prior Bacchus, who was worshipped by Cadmus. This is their
usual recourse, when they are hard pressed with inconsistencies. They then
create other personages, to help them out of their difficulties. They form,
with great facility, a new Semiramis, or Ninus; another Belus, Perseus,
Minos, Hermes, Phoroneus, Apis, though to little purpose: for the mistake
being fundamental, the inconveniencies cannot be remedied by such
substitutes. We are told that Cadmus was a Phenician: but Diodorus Siculus
speaks of him as assuredly of Egypt; and mentions moreover, that he was a
native of the Thebaïs: [1067]Καδμον εκ Θηβων οντα των Αιγυπτιων. Pherecydes
Syrus also, from whom most of the mythology of Greece was borrowed, makes
Cadmus an [1068]Egyptian, the son of Agenor and Argiope, who was the
daughter of Nilus. By others he is said to have been the son of Antiope,
the daughter of Belus: consequently he must originally have been of
Babylonish extraction. His father Agenor, from whom he is supposed to have
been instructed in the sciences, is represented by Nonnus as residing at
Thebes.
[1069]Πατρια θεσπεσιης δεδαημενος οργια τεχνης,
Αιγυπτιης σοφιης μεταναστιος, ημος Αγηνωρ
Μεμφιδος ενναετης ἑκατομπυλον ῳκεε Θηβην.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account