A Philosophical Essay on ProbabilitiesLaplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Philosophy
A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities
Laplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Probabilities
If the witness, wishing to deceive, has some interest in choosing number
79 among the numbers not drawn,—if he judges, for example, that having
placed upon this number a considerable stake, the announcement of its
drawing will increase his credit, the probability that he will choose
this number will no longer be as at first, 1/999, it will then be ½, ⅓,
etc., according to the interest that he will have in announcing its
drawing. Supposing it to be 1/9, it will be necessary to multiply by
this fraction the probability 999/1000 in order to get in the hypothesis
of the falsehood the probability of the event observed, which it is
necessary still to multiply by 1/10, which gives 111/10000 for the
probability of the event in the second hypothesis. Then the probability
of the first hypothesis, or of the drawing of number 79, is reduced by
the preceding rule to 9/120. It is then very much decreased by the
consideration of the interest which the witness may have in announcing
the drawing of number 79. In truth this same interest increases the
probability 9/10 that the witness will speak the truth if number 79 is
drawn. But this probability cannot exceed unity or 10/10; thus the
probability of the drawing of number 79 will not surpass 10/121. Common
sense tells us that this interest ought to inspire distrust, but
calculus appreciates the influence of it.
The probability _à priori_ of the number announced by the witness is
unity divided by the number of the numbers in the urn; it is changed by
virtue of the proof into the veracity itself of the witness; it may then
be decreased by the proof. If, for example, the urn contains only two
numbers, which gives ½ for the probability _à priori_ of the drawing of
number 1, and if the veracity of a witness who announces it is 4/10,
this drawing becomes less probable. Indeed it is apparent, since the
witness has then more inclination towards a falsehood than towards the
truth, that his testimony ought to decrease the probability of the fact
attested every time that this probability equals or surpasses ½. But if
there are three numbers in the urn the probability _à priori_ of the
drawing of number 1 is increased by the affirmation of a witness whose
veracity surpasses ⅓.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account