3. (Act. 3, Paul. 3.) Cod. Corsendonck. [xii], 4to, 9-¾ × 7, ff. 451 (24), Carp., _Eus. t._, κεφ. _t._, _prol._, _pict._, κεφ., τίτλ., _Am._, _Eus._, _syn._, once belonging to a convent at Corsendonck near Turnhout, now in the Imperial Library at Vienna (Forlos. 15, Kollar. 5). It was lent to Erasmus for his second edition in 1519, as he testifies on the first leaf (Alter). It had been collated before Alter by J. Walker for Bentley, when in “the Dominican Library, Brussels.” This collation is unpublished (Trin. Coll. B. xvii. 34): Ellis, Bentleii Critica Sacra, p. xxix (Greg.). 4. Cod. Regius 84 [xii], 7-¼ × 5-¾, ff. 212 (27), κεφ. _t._, κεφ., τίτλ., _Am._, _Eus._, _lect._, _syn._, _men._, _subscr._, στίχ., in the Royal Library at Paris (designated RI by Tischendorf), was rightly recognized by Le Long as Robert Stephen’s γ´ (see Chap. V). Mill notices its affinity to the Latin versions and the Complutensian edition (N. T. Prol. § 1161); _mut._ in Matt. ii. 9-20; John i. 49-iii. 11; forty-nine verses. It is clumsily written and contains _syn._ from some Fathers (Scholz, Greg.). 5. (Act. 5, Paul. 5.) Paris, National (Library), Greek 106 [xii or later], is Stephen’s δ´: 8-¼ × 6-1/8, ff. 348 (28), _prob._, κεφ. _t._, κεφ., τίτλ., _Am._, _Eus._ Carefully written and full of flourishes (Wetstein, Scholz, Greg.). 6. (Act. 6, Paul. 6.) Par. Nat. Gr. 112 [xi or later], is Stephen’s ε´; in text it much resembles Codd. 4, 5, and 75. 12mo, 5-½ × 4-1/8, ff. 235, _prol._, κεφ. _t._, κεφ., τίτλ., _Am._, _syn._ with St. Chrysostom’s Liturgy, _men._ (Wetstein, Griesbach, Scholz). This exquisite manuscript is written in characters so small, that some pages require a glass to read them. Scholz collated Matt., Mark i-iv, John vii, viii (Greg.). 7. Par. Nat. Gr. 71 [xi], is Stephen’s ϛ´. 8 × 6-¼, ff. 186 (29), _prol._, _syn._, _Carp._, _Eus. t._, _pict._, τίτλ. with metrical paraphrase, _Am._, _Eus._, _men._, very full _lect._ In style not unlike Cod. 4, but neater (Wetst., Scholz, Abbé Martin, Greg.). 8. Par. Nat. Gr. 49 [xi], 11-¼ × 8-½, ff. 199 (22), two columns, proved by Mr. Vansittart to be Stephen’s ζ´(227): beautifully written in two columns on the page. _Carp._, _Eus. t._, _prol._, _pict._, κεφ., τίτλ., _lect._, _men._, _Am._, _Eus._, _syn._ (Wetst., Scholz, Greg.). 9. Par. Nat. Gr. 83 [A.D. 1167, when “Manuel Porphyrogenitus was ruler of Constantinople, Amauri of Jerusalem, William II of Sicily”: this note (derived from Wetstein) is now nearly obliterate], 9-¼ × 6-¾, ff. 298 (20), is probably Stephen’s ιβ´. _Carp._, _Eus. t._, _pict._, κεφ., τίτλ., _Am._, _syn._, _mut._, _men._, _subscr._, στίχ. (first leaf of St. John). It once belonged to Peter Stella. The style is rather barbarous, and ornamentation peculiar (Kuster’s Paris 3, Scholz, Greg.).