A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II.Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose
Religion
A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II.
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Bibliothèque de l’Ecole des Chartes, 1860, p. 438; R. S. Bensly,
The missing fragment of the Latin Translation of the Fourth Book
of Ezra, p. 7 (Cambridge, 1875).
_ff_2. COD. CORBEIENSIS II [vi], now at Paris (Lat. 17,225),
formerly at Corbey, where it was numbered 195; it contains 190
leaves and is written in a beautiful round uncial hand. Quoted by
Sabatier, and a collation given by Bianchini in Mark, Luke, and
John; published in full by Belsheim (Christiania, 1887).
Belsheim’s work, however, has been since revised by M. Berger and
his revision communicated to the present writer (H. J. White).
_Mut._ Matt. i. 1-xi. 6; John xvii. 15-xviii. 9; xx. 22-xxi. 8;
Luke ix. 48-x. 21; xi. 45-xii. 6; and a few verses missing in
Matt. xi, Mark ix and xvi; Facsimile in Palaeogr. Soc. i. pl. 87.
_g_1. COD. SANGERMANENSIS I [ix], now at Paris (Lat. 11,553);
formerly in the Library of St. Germain des Prés, where it was
first numbered 15 and afterwards 86; it is the second volume of a
complete Bible, the first volume of which has been lost. This MS.
was known to R. Stephens, who in his Latin Bible, published
1538-40 and again 1546, quotes it as _Germ. Lat._, in consequence
of its breadth; it was also examined by R. Simon, who, writing in
1680, speaks of it at some length; Martianay published a collation
of its readings in his edition of the Corbey St. Matthew (_see_
under _ff_1); and Martianay’s collation, which indeed was faulty
enough, was reprinted by Bianchini. John Walker, Bentley’s
coadjutor in his great but unfinished work for the New Testament,
collated it carefully in 1720; and finally Bp. Wordsworth
published St. Matthew’s Gospel with full Introductions in 1883
(Old Latin Biblical Texts, No. 1, Oxford), and has collated the
other Gospels for his edition of the Vulgate. J. Walker cited the
MS. as μ; Bp. Wordsworth cites it as _g_1 in St. Matthew, G in the
other books of the New Testament. The text can only be called
strictly _Old Latin_ in St. Matthew, where it seems to be partly
of the European, partly of the Italian type; in the other Gospels
it is Vulgate, though largely mixed with Old Latin readings. _See_
below under Vulgate, MSS., no. 21.
_g_2. COD. SANGERMANENSIS II [x], 116 leaves, Irish hand, with a
mixed Old Latin and Vulgate text. Now at Paris (Lat. 13,169), but
was originally at Angers, and then apparently at Mans in the
province of Tours; possibly brought there by Ulgrinus, Bishop of
Mans 1057-65. See Berger, Histoire de la Vulgate pendant les
premiers Siècles du M.A., p. 48.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account