A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
History
A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
National Gallery (Great Britain); Painting -- England -- London -- Catalogs
It is Rome which gives the leading idea also to Poussin's
art. He has been called the "Raphael of France"; and certain
it is that at a time when the local art of France was purely
decorative in character, he returned, and strenuously adhered,
to classical traditions. Already at Paris he had studied casts
and prints after Raphael; and when he first went to Rome he
lived with Du Quesnoy ("Il Fiammingo"), under whom he learnt
the art of modelling _bassi-relievi_. He also studied anatomy,
and attended the academy of Domenichino, whom he considered
the first master in Rome. His profound classical learning has
caused him to be called "the learned Poussin." "He studied the
beautiful," says his biographer, "in the Greek statues of the
Vatican." "He studied the ancients so much," says Sir Joshua
Reynolds, "that he acquired a habit of thinking in their way,
and seemed to know perfectly the actions and gestures they
would use on every occasion." His learning went, however,
farther than this in its influence on his art. His ideal, says
Lanzi, was that of "philosophy in painting"; and in one of his
letters Poussin illustrates the idea from the Greek theory
of "modes" in music. If a subject were serious, it should be
painted in the Doric mode; if vehement, in the Phrygian; if
plaintive, in the Lydian; if joyous, in the Ionic.[72] This
classical learning of Poussin was the source at once of his
strength and of his weakness as an artist. On the one hand, it
often made his work wonderfully harmonious and impressive. Thus
in the Ionic mode, his Bacchanalian pictures in this Gallery
and elsewhere are nearly the best representations in art of
the Epicurean ideal of life, of a world in which enjoyment is
the end of existence. "His best works," says Ruskin, "are his
Bacchanalian revels, always brightly wanton, full of frisk and
fire; but they are coarser than Titian's[73] and infinitely
less beautiful. In all minglings of the human and brutal
character he leans on the bestial, yet with a sternly Greek
severity of treatment." Again, in more serious Doric mode, he
is "the great master of the elevated ideal of landscape." He
does not "put much power into his landscape when it becomes
principal; the best pieces of it occur in fragments behind
his figures. Beautiful vegetation, more or less ornamental in
character, occurs in nearly all his mythological subjects, but
his pure landscape is notable only for its dignified reserve;
the great squareness and horizontality of its masses, with
lowness of tone, giving it a deeply meditative character:"
see especially 40. On the other hand, he had the defects of
his training. It made him too restrained and too cold. "His
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account