A popular history of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b from the discovery of the American continent to the present timeHowitt, Mary (Mary Botham)
History
A popular history of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b from the discovery of the American continent to the present time
Howitt, Mary (Mary Botham)
United States -- History
This scheme of union was, however, rejected by all the colonial
assemblies, on the plea of giving too much power to the crown; and,
strange to say, was rejected likewise by the crown, because it gave too
much power to the people. The colonial union, therefore, being at an end
for the present, it was proposed by the British ministry that money
should be furnished for the carrying on of the war by England, to be
reimbursed by a tax on the colonies. This scheme, however, the colonies
strongly opposed, being averse, argued Massachusetts, to everything that
shall have the remotest tendency to raise a revenue in America for any
public use or purpose of government. It was, therefore, finally agreed
to carry on the war with British troops, aided by such auxiliaries as
the colonial assemblies would voluntarily furnish. These pending
territorial disputes led to the publication of more complete maps,
whereby the position and danger of the British colonies were more
clearly understood. The British colonies occupied about a thousand miles
of the Atlantic coast, but their extent inland was limited; the
population amounted to about 1,500,000. New France, on the contrary,
contained a population not exceeding 100,000, scattered over a vast
expanse of territory from Cape Breton to the mouth of the Mississippi,
though principally collected on the St. Lawrence. The very remoteness of
the French settlements, separated from the English by unexplored forests
and mountains, placed them in comparative security, while the whole
western frontier of the English, from Maine to Georgia, was exposed to
attacks of the Indians, disgusted by constant encroachments and ever
ready for war.[2]
While negotiations were being carried on with France for the adjustment
of the territorial quarrel, the establishment of French posts on the
Ohio and the attack on Washington being regarded as the commencement of
hostilities, General Braddock was selected as the American
major-general, under the Duke of Cumberland, commander-in-chief of the
British army. Braddock was a man of despotic temper, intrepid in action,
and severe as a disciplinarian; and as the duke had no confidence in any
but regular troops, it was ordered that the general and field officers
of the colonial forces should be of subordinate rank when serving with
the commissioned officers of the king. Washington, on his return from
the Great Meadows, found Dinwiddie re-organising the Virginia militia,
and that, according to the late orders, he himself was lowered to the
rank of captain, on which he indignantly retired from the service.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account