A Population Study of the Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) in Northeastern Kansas — John Shaqi
A Population Study of the Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) in Northeastern KansasMartin, Edwin Perry
Science
A Population Study of the Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) in Northeastern Kansas
Martin, Edwin Perry
Microtus
Runway systems and burrows are used by groups of voles rather than by
individuals. Most of the activity of voles is confined to these runways
and an exposed individual is seldom seen. A home range may include
several runway systems, and the ranges of individuals overlap
extensively. Both home ranges and patterns of runway systems change
constantly. Runways seem to be primarily feeding trails, and are
extended or abandoned as the voles change their feeding habits. Groups
of adult voles using a system of runways seem to have no special
relationship. Juveniles tend to stay near their mothers, but as they
mature, they shift their ranges and are replaced by other individuals.
Males wander more than females, and shift their ranges more often. No
intolerance of other voles exists and, in laboratory cages, groups of
voles lived together peaceably from the time they are placed together.
Crowding does not seem to be harmful directly, therefore, and high
densities will develop if food and cover resources permit.
As a prey item, the prairie vole proved to be an important part of the
biota of the Reservation. It was eaten frequently by almost all of the
larger vertebrate predators on the Reservation and was, seemingly, the
most important food item of the long-eared owl. The ability of the
prairie vole to maintain high levels of population over relatively broad
areas enhances its value as a prey species.
LITERATURE CITED
ALBERTSON, F. W.
1937. Ecology of a mixed prairie in west-central Kansas. Ecol.
Monog., 7:481-547.
BAILEY, V.
1902. Synopsis of the North American species of _Sigmodon_. Proc.
Biol. Soc. Washington, 15:101-116.
1924. Breeding, feeding and other life habits of meadow mice. Jour.
Agric. Res., 27:523-536.
BAKER, J. R., and R. M. RANSOM.
1932a. Factors affecting the breeding of the field mouse (_Microtus
agrestis_). Part I. Light. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B,
110:313-322.
1932b. Factors affecting the breeding of the field mouse (_Microtus
agrestis_). Part II. Temperature. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B,
112:39-46.
BLACK, T. D.
1937. Mammals of Kansas. Kansas State Board Agric., 13th Biennial
Rep., 1935-36:116-217.
BLAIR, W. F.
1939. Some observed effects of stream valley flooding on small
mammal populations in eastern Oklahoma. Jour. Mamm., 20:304-306.
1940. Home ranges and populations of the meadow vole in southern
Michigan. Jour. Wildlife Mgmt., 4:149-161.
1941. Techniques for the study of small mammal populations. Jour.
Mamm., 22:148-157.
1948. Population density, life span and mortality rates of small
mammals in the bluegrass meadow and bluegrass field associations of
southern Michigan. Amer. Midland Nat., 40:395-419.
BODENHEIMER, F. S., and F. SULMAN.
1946. The estrous cycle of _Microtus guentheri_ D. and A. and its
ecological implications. Ecol., 27:255-256.
BOLE, B. P., JR.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account