A Practical Manual of the Collodion Process, Giving in Detail a Method For Producing Positive and Negative Pictures on Glass and Paper.Humphrey, S. D. (Samuel Dwight)
Science
A Practical Manual of the Collodion Process, Giving in Detail a Method For Producing Positive and Negative Pictures on Glass and Paper.
Humphrey, S. D. (Samuel Dwight)
Ambrotype; Photography
_Articles necessary._--One quart Wedgewood mortar and pestle, or
evaporating dish; one glass rod; one pane of glass, large enough to cover
the mortar or dish; one ordinary-sized pail two-thirds full of pure rain
or distilled water, and at least ten times that quantity of water at hand;
twelve ounces (by weight, avoirdupois) of nitrate of potash (Dupont's
refined, pulverized); twelve ounces (by measure) of commercial sulphuric
acid; and three hundred and forty grains of clean, pure cotton wool.
_Remarks._--It is advisable that the mortar or dish be deep and narrow,
as the mixture can be better formed in a vessel of this shape. If not
convenient to procure a mortar, a common earthen bowl will answer; glass
is objectionable, as the heat generated in the combination of the acid and
nitre is liable to crack it. A new pail should not be used, especially
if it is painted, as the acids attack the paint, and injure the cotton.
I prefer one that has been used for some time, and has been frequently
cleaned. A common earthen wash-bowl, or any large glass dish, will answer
in place of the pail. Metal pails or vessels should not be used.
_Nitrate of Potash_ (saltpetre) should be dry and finely-powdered. I use
none other than Dupont's refined; this is very nearly, if not absolutely,
chemically pure.
The commercial _Sulphuric Acid_ (oil of vitriol) of America is of great
uniformity of strength, as sold by druggists generally. I use a test-bulb
graduated to the proper density, and have been very successful in my
experiments.
In some twenty different samples of acid, used in different cities in the
United States, I found only one that produced a poor cotton, and this
might have been influenced by the moisture of the atmosphere, it being a
very rainy day when I used it.
During my recent and somewhat extensive practice, I have thought that
the _fine long fibres_ of cotton wool do not make so desirable a soluble
cotton as that which is heavy or common. Four or five very careful
experiments upon this point, have had the effect to produce in me a strong
belief that my ideas are entitled to some consideration. I should not
select the _finest_ cotton for making soluble cotton, but now invariably
take that which is _thick_ or _coarse_.
The result of my experience is (other things being equal), that cotton
prepared in fine dry weather has a greater degree of solubility than when
prepared in a moist atmosphere: hence I would recommend the experimenter
to choose fine, clear weather for preparing it.
=Manipulation.=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account