There is nothing new in the fact that men have ceased to believe in the
religion of their fathers. In the history of Catholic Christianity,
there has always existed a tradition, extending from the authors of the
Fourth Gospel through Origen to the neo-Platonists of modern times,
which rejects the popular idea of God as a power acting upon events,
and of immortality as everlasting life, and translates the popular
theology into a symbolic statement of a purely spiritual experience.
In every civilized age there have been educated and discerning men who
could not accept literally and simply the traditions of the ancient
faith. We are told that during the Periclean Age “among educated men
everything was in dispute: political sanctions, literary values, moral
standards, religious convictions, even the possibility of reaching any
truth about anything.” When the educated classes of the Roman world
accepted Christianity they had ceased to believe in the pagan gods,
and were much too critical to accept the primitive Hebraic theories of
the creation, the redemption, and the Messianic Kingdom which were so
central in the popular religion. They had to do what Socrates had done;
they had to take the popular theology in a “higher” and therefore in a
different sense before they could use it. Indeed, it is so unusual to
find an age of active-minded men in which the most highly educated are
genuinely orthodox in the popular sense, that the Thirteenth Century,
the age of Dante and St. Thomas Aquinas, when this phenomenon is
reputed to have occurred, is regarded [p012] as a unique and wonderful
period in the history of the world. It is not at all unlikely that
there never was such an age in the history of civilized men.
And yet, the position of modern men who have broken with the religion
of their fathers is in certain profound ways different from that of
other men in other ages. This is the first age, I think, in the history
of mankind when the circumstances of life have conspired with the
intellectual habits of the time to render any fixed and authoritative
belief incredible to large masses of men. The dissolution of the
old modes of thought has gone so far, and is so cumulative in its
effect, that the modern man is not able to sink back after a period
of prophesying into a new but stable orthodoxy. The irreligion of
the modern world is radical to a degree for which there is, I think,
no counterpart. For always in the past it has been possible for new
conventions to crystallize, and for men to find rest and surcease of
effort in accepting them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account