A Refutation of the Charges Made against the Confederate States of America of Having Authorized the Use of Explosive and Poisoned Musket and Rifle Balls during the Late Civil War of 1861-65Hayden, Horace Edwin
History
A Refutation of the Charges Made against the Confederate States of America of Having Authorized the Use of Explosive and Poisoned Musket and Rifle Balls during the Late Civil War of 1861-65
Hayden, Horace Edwin
Confederate States of America
This summer the distinguished officer who commanded the 143d regiment of
Pennsylvania volunteers, United States army, at the battle of
Gettysburg, informed me that during the last day of the battle, he and
his men frequently heard, above their heads, amid the whistling of the
minnie balls from the Confederate side, sharp, explosive sounds like the
snapping of musket caps. He mentioned the matter to an ordnance officer
at the time. The officer replied that what he heard was explosive rifle
balls, which the Confederates had captured from the Union troops, who
had lately received them from the Ordnance Department.
From the fact that the Gardiner shell is not fitted with a percussion
cap at the point of the projectile, and is not easily exploded by hand,
and from the additional fact that only about ten thousand are reported
as having been used in action, I am willing to believe that the primary
purpose of the Government of the United States in using them was the
exploding of caissons. There is, moreover, no evidence that any of these
shells were issued from the Ordnance Bureau after the year 1863. The
Gardiner shells are so constructed as to have no different appearance in
the cartridge from the common minnie ball--only the title on the box,
and an examination of the ball when separate from the cartridge, giving
any indication of its explosive character.
I know not _certainly_ if any other such projectiles were used by the
United States troops, nor have I any especial desire to prosecute the
investigation further than to prove the position taken in this paper.
It would be disingenuous in me if I failed to notice the fact that a
charge somewhat similar to that which begins this article was made by a
correspondent in the _Scientific American_ for September 6th, 1862,
volume VII, page 151, as follows:
Recently it was my privilege to examine, in the hands of a man just
from Fortress Monroe, an explosive bullet, such as was used by the
Rebels in the six days' battle. It is conical in shape, about one
inch long, made of lead, and consists of two parts--viz: a solid
head piece and a cylindrical chamber, which are united together by a
screw. From the point of the bullet projects a little rod, which
passes down through a small hole in the head piece into the chamber
below, where it was connected with a percussion cap. The chamber
contains about a tablespoonful of powder. You can readily perceive
that if the bullet should encounter a bone or other hard substance
when entering a man's body, it will explode and thereby produce a
fatal wound.
F. J. C.
PHILADELPHIA, August 23, 1862.
In the Patent Office Report (United States) for 1863-4 will be found a
shell exactly corresponding to this one:
No. 39,593--Joseph Nottingham Smith, New York, N. Y.--_Improvement
in Elongated Projectile for Firearms_--Patent dated August 18, 1863.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account