So, in Mr. Sherson's case, there has been published an unsigned or anonymous Report of it, by a Mr. Halhed, one of the clerks in the India-House, whose error "was not his first" of the kind, yet whose Report was ordered, it has confidently been asserted, by only some one or two of the whole Court of Directors. In Mr. Sherson's case again the Board of Controul has compelled the erasure, from a despatch of the Court of Directors, of a paragraph recommendatory of an investigation into the conduct (on this Mr. Sherson's trial) of no less a person than Sir Francis Macnaghten, the _second_ of three Judges, of whom the _third_ is almost as much concerned as Sir Francis himself. Nor let these parallels be thought to beg the question, since they might readily have been extended; and since Major Hart's case would prove itself in Courts of Law, whether by artful confessions, or by other and better description of testimony. Unhappily, however, the period for this is expired. W. H. INGLIS. 3, Mincing-lane. THE END. MARCHANT, Printer, Ingram-Court, Fenchurch-Street. TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: Footnotes have been moved from the middle of the text to the end of the paragraph referring to those footnotes. Apart from that, no other changes have been made for this e-text version.