We would observe upon this testimony of Enom Beg, that the affidavit-dubash of Major Hart, Sadashevah Moodiliar, who is wont to describe himself as "a writer in charge of the public servants in the grain-department," is not, in our opinion, so important a personage as Major Hart's head conicopoly Dunnacody, and this because the employment of a head conicopoly is much more _official_ than that of a dubash, however greatly any particular occasion, like the present, for instance, may render the latter's services desirable. But in India it would otherwise appear that the dubash is accounted by far the more important personage of the two, at least if we can judge from Mr. Sherson's trial at Madras, also for rice-frauds; for, on this trial Sir John Newbolt, as third of three Judges, was pleased to argue, saying, 'Audy Narrain, (the dubash of Mr. Sherson,) one of the persons offering the bribe, which is _almost tantamount_ to naming Mr. Sherson himself.' Even in this case of Major Hart there is what is not wholly dissimilar to bribery; namely, where the conicopoly replies, 'that as he (Enom Beg) would probably be sent for by the Committee sitting near the general's tent, he (the conicopoly) desired him to keep favour on him.' The frequent occurrence among native Indians of the word _lies_ is to be here regarded as an Anglo-Orientalism. It is to the probability of Enom Beg and his fellow-soldiers' testimonies over those of Major Hart and Captain Macleod's head people, that attention shall safely be paid. Relative to the benjarries and maistries of Captain Macleod, as well as to Major Hart's head people, we must differ from the Committee of Inquiry, where saying that "a _further_ examination of persons of those descriptions will not tend to afford any new information on the subject." Our cause of difference is, that neither Sadashevah and Dunnacody, nor Sechiram and Narnapah, were _ever_ examined by this Committee. Major-General Macaulay "cannot conceive, under the strong case which appears to be made out, how the government of this country and Parliament can, _with a due regard to character_, abstain from a revision of the whole question." Neither can we conceive how, in this respect,--not the government (of the Board of Controul and Court of Directors,) but--Parliament abstains. APPENDIX. _To the Proprietors of East-India Stock._ Major Hart, in his advertisement, (_Times_, 24th of April,) says "I fear that I shall have no alternative but to appeal against such daily slander to the laws of my country." In other words, he, who sought to fight a duel with Major-Gen. Macaulay, fears. And may he fear! But Major Hart dares not appeal to the laws of his country, were he even slandered after the _daily_ manner of his own advertisement. Major Hart is too old a soldier to have to learn, that He who fights and runs away, Lives to fight another day.