A rough sketch of modern Paris : $b or, Letters on society, manners, public curiosities, and amusements, in that capitalLemaistre, J. G. (John Gustavus)
History
A rough sketch of modern Paris : $b or, Letters on society, manners, public curiosities, and amusements, in that capital
Lemaistre, J. G. (John Gustavus)
Paris (France) -- Description and travel
It is also the favourite theme of conversation; and a parisian compelled
to talk with a foreigner, is sure to begin with the following words:
“Allez vous souvent, monsieur, au spectacle? Ne sont ils pas bien beaux
nos spectacles?” (Do you often go to the _spectacles_? Are not our
_spectacles_ very fine?)
A similar observation forms likewise the hospitable kind of consolation
which an englishman sometimes receives, if he complain, that he has not
seen much of french society. “Mais cependant, vous ne pouvez pas manquer
d’amusement; à Paris les spectacles sont si beaux.” (You cannot want
amusement, however; the spectacles at Paris are so fine.)
In consequence of the general application of this word in France to
every thing relating to the stage, a parisian, on his arrival in London,
wishing to go to the play, supposed that he had only to look for the word
spectacle in a french and english dictionary; and, having found that
the literal translation gave him the same word, with perfect confidence
directed his hackney coachman to _drive to the spectacle_. The fellow,
supposing that he wanted to purchase a pair of spectacles, conducted
him to the celebrated shop at Charing-cross. The frenchman flew into
a passion, and by his gestures conveyed, that this was not the place
where he desired to go. The coachman, imagining that this was not the
optician’s, to which he wished to be taken, carried him to several others
in different parts of the town. After a long round, during which the
favourite oaths of the two countries were mutually exchanged between
_monsieur_ and his _charioteer_, the former was compelled to pass his
evening in the hackney coach instead of the play-house, and thus learnt
the difference between french _spectacles_ and english _spectacles_.
[7] Mademoiselle Beauharnois is since married to Louis Bonaparte, one of
the brothers of the first consul; to whom she has become, therefore, both
daughter and sister.
[8] Married to General le Clerc, who commanded the expedition to St.
Domingo. She accompanied him to that island, and incurred all the dangers
of climate and of war. She did so in obedience to Bonaparte’s particular
orders; with whom it is an undeviating principle, that a wife should
always follow the steps and fortunes of her husband.
[9] As we should say in english, “a lost thing.” The french expression
is more commonly used, and is infinitely stronger in its meaning. It is
adopted on all occasions of misfortune; such as to deplore the death of
a friend, or the loss of a “spectacle.” A general was lately killed in a
duel. A fair parisian of high fashion, to whom he was much attached, on
hearing of the accident, exclaimed, with an accent of deep despair, “Que
je suis à plaindre! il devoit m’avoir amenée au bal de l’opéra demain.
Voilà une affaire bien manquée.” (How am I to be pitied! he was to have
taken me to the ball at the opera to-morrow. Here is a lost thing, or a
party completely deranged.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account