A Second Letter on the late Post Office Agitation — John Shaqi
A Second Letter on the late Post Office AgitationVaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
Religion
A Second Letter on the late Post Office Agitation
Vaughan, C. J. (Charles John)
Postal service -- Great Britain; Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
There is another region, besides, into which I must resolutely refuse to
follow my opponent; the region of personalities. He is evidently an
adept in the occult science of _motives_. He speaks, with the irritation
of a baffled magician, of any one whose spirit he cannot discern. He
confesses that I have puzzled him. He is unwilling to suspect one
motive, unable to impute another. The question is left doubtful. {11a}
But it is otherwise with Mr. Rowland Hill. He lies helplessly open to
the dissecting knife of the operator. And with unflinching severity is
it applied. {11b} Hostility to the Sabbath, enmity against
religion—these are visibly his principles. All else is a veil, a cloke,
a mask. When he speaks of desiring rest on the Sunday for his
subordinates, he means labour. When he prefaces his Minute with the
profession of regard for the Sunday, he speaks but to deceive, and smiles
(_vainly_ smiles, says my Reviewer) at the easy credulity of his victims.
{12} When he not only promises, but effects, a measure of undeniable
relief,—the discontinuance, for example, of a second Sunday
delivery,—this is only to disguise his restless spirit of antichristian
malignity, that he may proceed, more covertly, but not less surely, to
his real object, the annihilation of an ordinance of God.
I am not the apologist of Mr. Rowland Hill. I know him only, as all the
world knows him, as the originator and accomplisher of one of the boldest
and most beneficial of all the achievements of modern civilization. It
will require more than mere assertion, to attach to his name those odious
imputations which it is necessary for the impugners of the late change to
suggest and to foster. And what, after all, are the grounds on which
such imputations rest? Mr. Rowland Hill, says the _Record_, was a
Director of a Railway which refused Return tickets extending from
Saturday to Monday, and thus compelled its passengers to travel on the
Sunday. {13a} Mr. Rowland Hill, says the Author of the Reply, is an
officer of that department of the Government, which is notorious above
all others for its desecration of the Sabbath: {13b} a department of the
Government, we may add, so beyond all others unfortunate, that to it
alone is denied the possibility of self-reformation, and every effort
after amendment is branded by anticipation as hypocrisy and imposture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account