A short history of architectureTuckerman, Arthur Lyman
History
A short history of architecture
Tuckerman, Arthur Lyman
Architecture -- History
The great hall of assembly, which adjoined the vestibule, was generally
the finest portion of the temple. The architraves supporting the roof
rested upon a great number of lofty columns, which in the centre rose
to a greater height, in order to obtain a clerestory, by which the
hall was lighted. The largest of these is in the temple of Karnak,
measuring 170 by 329 feet. The central avenue consists of twelve
columns, 62 feet high by 11 feet 6 inches in diameter. Besides these
there are one hundred and twenty-two others, 42 feet 6 inches in height
and 28 feet in circumference. The lintel over the doorway by which it
is entered measured 40 feet in length. The sanctuary was contiguous
to the great hall, and terminated the suite. This consisted of a
chamber, either occupying the whole of the rear space, or
isolated by corridors on each side, with smaller sanctuaries opposite.
In many of these, altars and statues have been found, some of the former
formed of a single block, hollowed at the top and pierced through from
top to bottom, so that sacrifices placed upon them could be consumed
apparently without ignition, by means of fires kindled in subterranean
vaults.
In connection with the halls in the temple of Abydus and elsewhere
there were a number of vaulted chambers; the vault not being formed of
a series of true arches, that is, with joints radiating to a common
centre, but consisting of stone beams placed one beside the other, and
hollowed out on the under side. The arch, however, was not unknown to
the Egyptians—there are stone vaulted tombs at Sakkarah of the time of
Psammetichus (650 B.C.), and crude brick arches have been found at Thebes
dating as far back as the period of the eighth dynasty (2925 B.C.?). The
antiquity of the arch has been the subject of much debate, owing chiefly
to the fact that the Greeks made no use of it; recent explorations have,
however, shown that this constructive expedient was known both in Egypt
and Assyria many years before it was adopted by the Etruscans, to whom
its invention was long attributed.
The exterior walls of all temples were built on a batter, sloping inward
at an angle of about seventy degrees and with scarcely any openings.
The inside walls were perpendicular, and decorated with bass-reliefs and
paintings. These were often of a most elaborate character, and it is from
them that so much has been learned concerning the ancient history of the
country.
The rock-cut temples of Nubia are laid out on much the same plan. They
usually consist of a pronaos, naos, and sanctuary, forming a suite, with
an entrance marked by colossal statuary hewn out of the side of the
cliff. Some have a dromos of sphinxes, propylæa, and a peristyle court of
masonry preceding the excavated portions. The temple of Wady Sabooah is
the best example of the latter. Of the former none can compare with the
Great and Small temples of Aboo Simbel, or Ipsambool, which are of the
time of Rameses the Great.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account