A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
As to the original similarity of Hebraic and other Canaanite
religions cp. E. Meyer, Gesch. des Alt. §§ 309-11 (i, 372-76);
Kuenen, i, 223; Wellhausen, Israel, p. 440; Winckler,
Gesch. Israels, passim; Réville, Prolég. de l'hist. des
relig. 1881, p. 85. "Before being monotheistic, Israel was
simply monolatrous, and even that only in its religious élite"
(Réville). "Their [the Canaanites'] worship was the same in
principle as that of Israel, but it had a higher organization"
(Menzies, Hist. of Rel. p. 179; cp. Tiele, Outlines, pp. 85-89). On
the side of the traditional view, Mr. Lang, while sharply
challenging most of the propositions of the higher critics,
affirms that "we know that Israel had, in an early age, the
conception of the moral Eternal; we know that, at an early age,
the conception was contaminated and anthropomorphized; and we
know that it was rescued, in a great degree, from this corruption,
while always retaining its original ethical aspect and sanction"
(Making of Religion, p. 295). If "we know" this, the discussion
is at an end. But Mr. Lang's sole documentary basis for the
assertion is just the fabricated record, reluctantly abandoned
by theological scholars as such. When this is challenged,
Mr. Lang falls back on the position that such low races as
the Australians and Fuegians have a "moral Supreme Being,"
and that therefore Israel "must" have had one (p. 309). It will
be found, however, that the ethic of these races is perfectly
primitive, on Mr. Lang's own showing, and that his estimate is a
misinterpretation. As to their Supreme Beings, it might suffice
to compare Mr. Lang's Making of Religion, chs. ix, xii, with his
earlier Myth, Ritual, and Religion, i, 168, 335; ii, 6, etc.;
but, as we have seen (above, p. 93), the Supreme Being of the
Australians eludes the closest search in a number of tribes; and
the "moral" factor is equally intangible. Mr. Lang in his later
reasoning has merely added the ambiguous and misleading epithet
"Supreme," stressing it indefinitely, to the ordinary God-idea
of the lower races. (Cp. Cox, Mythol. of Aryan Races, ed. 1882,
p. 155; and K. O. Müller, Introd. to Sci. Mythol. Eng. tr. p. 184.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account