A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
It seems probable, finally, that such figures as Elijah, who
ascends to heaven in a fiery chariot, and Elisha, the "bald head"
and miracle-worker, are similar constructions of personages out
of Sun-God lore. In such material lies part of the refutation of
the thesis of Renan (Hist, des langues sémit. 2e édit. pp. 7,
485) that the Semites were natural monotheists, devoid of
mythology. [Renan is followed in whole or in part by Nöldeke,
Sketches from Eastern Hist. Eng. tr. p. 6; Soury, Relig. of
Israel, Eng. tr. pp. 2, 10; Spiegel, Erânische Alterthumskunde, i,
389; also Roscher, Draper, Peschel, and Bluntschli, as cited by
Goldziher, Mythology Among the Hebrews, Eng. tr. p. 4, note. On
the other side compare Goldziher, ch. i; Steinthal's Prometheus
and Samson, Eng. tr. (with Goldziher), pp. 391, 428, etc., and his
Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und den Römern,
1863, pp. 15-17; Kuenen, Rel. of Israel, i, 225; Smith, Rel. of the
Semites, p. 49; Ewald, Hist. of Israel, Eng. tr. 4th ed. i, 38-40;
Müller, Chips, i, 345 sq.; Selected Essays, 1881, ii, 402 sq.;
Nat. Rel. p. 314.] Renan's view seems to be generally connected
with the assumption that life in a "desert" makes a race for ever
unimaginative or unitary in its thought. The Arabian Nights might
be supposed a sufficient proof to the contrary. The historic truth
seems to be that, stage for stage, the ancient Semites were as
mythological as any other race; but that (to say nothing of the
Babylonians and Assyrians) the mythologies of the Hebrews and
of the Arabs were alike suppressed as far as possible in their
monotheistic stage. Compare Renan's own admissions, pp. 27, 110,
475, and Hist. du peuple d'Israël, i, 49-50.
At other places, however, Yahweh was symbolized and worshipped in the
image of a young bull, [351] a usage associated with the neighbouring
Semitic cult of Molech, but probably indigenous, or at least early,
in the case of Yahweh also. A God, for such worshippers, needed to be
represented by something, if he were to be individualized as against
others; and where there was not an ark or a sacred stone or special
temple or idol there could be no cult at all. "The practices of ancient
religion require a fixed meeting-place between the worshippers and
their God." [352] The pre-Exilic history of Yahweh-worship seems
to be in large part that of a struggle between the devotees of the
imageless worship fixed to the temple at Jerusalem, and other worships,
with or without images, at other and less influential shrines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account