A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
The leaning to pantheism is established by the discovery that
the disputed lines, "Zeus is sky, earth, and heaven: Zeus is all
things, yea, greater than all things" (Frag. 443), belonged to the
lost tragedy of the Heliades (Haigh, Tragic Drama of the Greeks,
1896, p. 88). For the pessimism see the Prometheus, 247-51. The
anti-anthropomorphism is further to be made out from the lines
ascribed to Æschylus by Justin Martyr (De Monarchia, c. 2)
and Clemens Alexandrinus (Stromata, v, 14). They are expressly
pantheistic; but their genuineness is doubtful. The story that
Æschylus was nearly killed by a theatre audience on the score
that he had divulged part of the mysteries in a tragedy (Haigh,
The Attic Theatre, 1889, p. 316; Tragic Drama, pp. 49-50)
does not seem to have suggested to Aristotle, who tells it
(Nicomachean Ethics, iii, 2), any heterodox intention on the
tragedian's part; but it is hard to see an orthodox believer
in the author either of the Prometheus, wherein Zeus is posed
as brutal might crucifying innocence and beneficence, or of
the Agamemnon, where the father, perplexed in the extreme, can
but fall back helplessly on formulas about the all-sufficiency
of Zeus when called upon to sacrifice his daughter. Cp. Haigh,
Tragic Drama, p. 86 sq. "Some critics," says Mr. Haigh (p. 88),
"have been led to imagine that there is in Æschylus a double
Zeus--the ordinary God of the polytheistic religion and the one
omnipotent deity in whom he really believed. They suppose that he
had no genuine faith in the credibility of the popular legends,
but merely used them as a setting for his tragedies; and that his
own convictions were of a more philosophical type," as seen in
the pantheistic lines concerning Zeus. To this Mr. Haigh replies
that it is "most improbable that there was any clear distinction
in the mind of Æschylus" between the two conceptions of Zeus;
going on, however, to admit that "much, no doubt, he regarded
as uncertain, much as false. Even the name 'Zeus' was to him a
mere convention." Mr. Haigh in this discussion does not attempt
to deal with the problem of the Prometheus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account