A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes — John Shaqi
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
One of the best of our missionary witnesses, H. A. Junod, in his
valuable study of the South African Thonga, testifies both to
the commonness of individual variation in the way of religious
fancy and the occurrence of sporadic unbelief, usually ended by
fear. Individuals freely indulge in concrete speculations--e.g.,
as to the existence of animal souls--which do not win vogue
(Life of a South African Tribe, vol. ii, 1913, p. 342 sq.),
though the reporter seems to overlook the possibility that
such ideas may be adopted by a tribe. Freethinking ideas have,
of course, by far the least chance of currency. "The young
folks of Libombo used to blaspheme in their hearts, saying,
'There are no Gods.' But," added the witness, "we very soon saw
that there were some, when they killed one of us," who trod on
a snake (work cited, pp. 354-55). That testimony illustrates
well the difficulties of rational progress in a primitive
community. But at times the process may be encouraged by the
environment. The early missionary Ellis gives an instance of a
community in Hawaii that had abandoned all religious practices:
"We asked them who was their God. They said they had no God;
formerly they had many: but now they had cast them all away. We
asked them if they had done well in abolishing them. They said
'Yes,' for tabu had occasioned much labour and inconvenience,
and drained off the best of their property. We asked them if it
was a good thing to have no God.... They said perhaps it was;
for they had nothing to provide for the great sacrifices, and were
under no fear of punishment for breaking tabu; that now one fire
cooked their food, and men and women ate together the same kind
of provisions." (W. Ellis, Tour Through Hawaii or Owhyhee, 1827,
p. 100.) The community in question had in their own way reached
the Lucretian verdict, Tantum relligio potuit suadere malorum.
Unless, again, such witnesses as Moffat be unfaithful reporters as
well as mistaken in their inferences, some of the natives with whom
they dealt were all but devoid of the ordinary religious notions [80]
which in the case of other natives have enabled the missionaries to
plant their doctrines. Nor is there anything hard of belief in the idea
that, just as special religious movements spread credence in certain
periods, a lack of active teachers in certain tribes may for a time
have let previously common beliefs pass almost out of knowledge. If
it be true that the Black Death wrought a great decline in the
ecclesiastical life of England in the fourteenth century, [81] a long
period of life-destroying conditions might eliminate from the life of
a savage tribe all lore save that of primary self-preservation. Moffat
incidentally notes the significant fact that rain-makers in his time
were usually foreigners to the tribes in which they operated. [82]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account