A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217 to 1688Hannay, David
History
A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217 to 1688
Hannay, David
Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History
Number Wages
of of
Men. Men.
Sir William Trevellian, captain, at 18d. a day 1 42/-
His retinue, every man 5/- a month 420 £105
The town of Gloucester, every man 5/- a month 25 £6 15/-
John Clerk, master 1 5/-
Mariners, every man 5/- a month 240 £60
Dead shares, that is to say, the master, 6; his mate, 2;
the pilot, 3; four quartermasters, 4; their mates, 3;
the boatswain, 2; his mate, 1; the coxswain, 1; his
mate, 1/2; the carpenter, 1; the caulker, 1; the steward,
1; his mate, 1/2; the purser, 1 = 27-1/2, £6, 17s. 6d.
Gunners, every man 5/- a month 20 100/-
Rewards to the gunners, that is to say, the master gunner,
3/- a month; his mate, 2/6; the four quartermasters,
every one of them 2/6 apiece, 10/-; fourteen gunners
at 20d. apiece, 23/4 40/10
Sum of the men, 602; of the dead shares, 27-1/2;
of the money, £187, 10s. 4d.
No lieutenant is named, and an officer of that name only appears later,
but he probably had an ancestor in the gentleman who was captain of
the retinue of Sir William Trevelyan. This gentleman was a soldier
appointed to fight, and not to attend to the navigation and seamanship,
which was the duty of the master. From the fact that the mariners are
given as a separate class, we may confidently conclude that the retinue
consisted of soldiers, whom the captain brought with him. It will be
seen that they greatly exceeded the sailors in number, and this was for
long the rule. There is, in truth, no greater mistake than to suppose
that the crews of the great warships at any time contained a majority
of real seamen, but in Henry's reign the proportion of soldiers was
larger than was commonly the case in later times. The indenture made
in 1512 with Sir Edward Howard provides that of the 3000 men to be
raised over and above the crew of the =Regent=, which is mustered by
itself, 1750 were to be soldiers, and 1233 sailors. It is probable,
however, that under the name of soldiers were included many men who
afterwards would have been entered as "waisters" and "landsmen," parts
of the ship's company who were only expected to work on deck or below,
and were not in the proper sense "sailormen." The gunners also were
a separate class, and we may safely conclude in their case also that
they were not--at least not necessarily--sailors, but rather marine
artillerymen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account