EXCEPT to the reader who is of a legal or antiquarian turn of mind, the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries are the least interesting in the
history of Wales—the very centuries that are the most glorious and the
most stirring in the history of England. The older historians stop when
they come to the year 1284, and sometimes give a hasty outline of a few
rebellions up to 1535. They then give the Welsh a glowing testimonial as
a law-abiding and loyal people, and find them too uninteresting to write
any more about them.
The history of Wales does, indeed, appear to be nothing more than the
gradual disappearance of Welsh institutions. The Court of Wales was
restored with the king in 1660; but its work had been done, and it came
to an end in 1689. The Great Sessions came to an end in 1830; and,
though we now see that their disappearance was a mistake, the bill
abolishing them passed through Parliament without a division. The last
difference between England and Wales was deleted; and if Wales has no
separate existence left, why should we write or read its history?
Because the two centuries of apparent settlement and sleep were the
period of a silent revolution, more important, if our aim is to explain
the living present rather than the dead past, than all the exciting plots
and battles of the House of Cunedda from the rise of Maelgwn to the fall
of the last Llywelyn. During these centuries, the history of Wales
ceases to be the history of princes and nobles, it becomes the history of
the people. Owen Glendower’s few years of power were a kind of prophecy;
but Owen once appeared to the abbot of Valle Crucis, so tradition says,
to declare that he had come before his time. We pass then, very
gradually, from the history of a privileged class, speaking literary
Welsh, with a literature famous for the wealth of its imagination and the
artistic beauty of its form—we pass on to the history of a peasantry,
rude and ignorant at first, retaining the servile traits of centuries of
subjection, but gradually becoming self-reliant, prosperous, and
thoughtful.
The real history of a nation is shown by its literature. Its records and
its chronicles are but the notes and comments of various ages. In the
period of the princes and nobles, you can trace the rise and decline of a
great literature; watch how it gathers strength and beauty from Cynddelw
to Dafydd ap Gwilym, and how the strength begins to fail and the beauty
to wane, from Dafydd ap Gwilym to Tudur Aled. In the period of the
people, from Tudor times on, the peasants tried at first to imitate the
poetry of the past; then they began to write and think in their own way.
It is not my aim to explain the periods of Welsh literature now; I am
going to do that in another book. But, as I have mentioned three typical
poets in the period of the princes, I will also mention three poets in
the period of the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account