The Act of 1535 had, as we have seen, given Wales a representation in
Parliament. Each shire had one member only; except Monmouth, which had
two. Each shire town had one member, except that of Merioneth; and
Haverfordwest was given a member. The county franchise was the forty
shilling freehold; it therefore excluded not only those who had no
connection with the land, but the copyholder—who was really a landowner,
but whose tenure was regarded as base, on account of his villein origin.
This copyholder was undoubtedly the descendant of the Welsh serf of
mediæval times.
The first Reform Act, that of 1832, was won for the great manufacturing
towns of England, but Wales benefited by it. It extended the franchise
to the copyholder, and to the farmer paying £50 rent, in the counties; it
gave the towns a uniform £10 household franchise. It also brought many
of the towns into the system of representation. It raised the number of
members from twenty-seven to thirty-two; the agricultural districts
getting two, and the mining districts two.
The slight change in representation is a recognition of the growing
industries of the country, especially in the coal and iron districts.
The coal of the great coalfield of South Wales had been worked as far
back as Norman times; but it was in the nineteenth century that the coal
and iron industries of South Wales, and the coal and slate industries of
North Wales became important. Cardiff, Swansea, and Newport became
important ports; and places that few had ever heard of before—like
Ystradyfodwg or Blaenau Ffestiniog—became the centres of important
industries. But, in 1832, Wales was still mainly pastoral and
agricultural; and the Act, though it did much for the towns, left the
representation of the counties in the hands of the same class. Still, it
was the towns that showed disappointment, as was seen in the Chartism of
the wool district of Llanidloes and of the coal district of Newport.
The second Reform Act, of 1867, gave Merthyr Tydvil two representatives
instead of one, otherwise it left the distribution of seats as it had
been before. But the new extension of the franchise—to the borough
householder, the borough £10 lodger, and especially the £12 tenant
farmer—gave new classes political power. It was followed by a fierce
struggle between the old landed gentry and their tenants, a struggle
which was moderated to a certain extent by the Ballot Act of 1870, and by
the great migration of the country population to the slate and coal
districts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account