A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger: A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved; in the Pierpont Morgan Library New YorkRand, Edward Kennard
General
A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger: A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved; in the Pierpont Morgan Library New York
Rand, Edward Kennard
Manuscripts, Latin -- Facsimiles; Manuzio, Aldo, 1449 or 50-1515; Paleography, Latin; Pliny, the Younger -- Correspondence
It is not worth while to attempt a more elaborate calculation. With the
edges matching so nearly, it is obvious that the original manuscript as
known and used in the fifteenth century could not have contained some
other work, however brief, before Book I of Pliny’s _Letters_. If the
manuscript contained the entire ten books it consisted of about 260
leaves. This sum is obtained by counting the number of lines in the
Teubner edition of 1912, dividing this sum by 19, and adding thereto
pages for colophons and indices. It would be too bold to suppose
that this calculation necessarily gives us the original size of the
manuscript, since the manuscript may have had less than ten books, or it
may, on the other hand, have had other works. But if it contained only
the ten books of the _Letters_, then 260 folios is an approximately
correct estimate of its size.
It is hard to believe that only six leaves of the original manuscript
have escaped destruction. The fact that the outside sheet (foll. 48r and
53v) is not much worn nor badly soiled suggests that the gathering of
six leaves must have been torn from the manuscript not so very long ago
and that the remaining portions may some day be found.
[Sidenote: _Disposition_]
The pages in our manuscript are written in long lines,[4] in _scriptura
continua_, with hardly any punctuation.
[Footnote 4: Many of our oldest Latin manuscripts have two and even
three columns on a page, a practice evidently taken over from the
roll. But very ancient manuscripts are not wanting which are written
in long lines, _e.g._, the Codex Vindobonensis of Livy, the Codex
Bobiensis of the Gospels, or the manuscript of Pliny’s _Natural
History_ preserved at St. Paul in Carinthia.]
Each page begins with a large letter, even though that letter occur in
the body of a word (cf. foll. 48r, 51v, 52r).[5]
[Footnote 5: This is an ear-mark of great antiquity. It is found,
for example, in the Berlin and Vatican Schedae Vergilianae in square
capitals (Berlin lat. 2º 416 and Rome Vatic. lat. 3256 reproduced in
Zangemeister and Wattenbach’s _Exempla Codicum Latinorum_, etc., pl.
14, and in Steffens, _Lateinische Paläographie_², pl. 12b), in the
Vienna, Paris, and Lateran manuscripts of Livy, in the Codex
Corbeiensis of the Gospels, and here and there in the palimpsest
manuscript of Cicero’s _De Re Publica_ and in other manuscripts.]
Each epistle begins with a large letter. The line containing the address
which precedes each epistle also begins with a large letter. In both
cases the large letter projects into the left margin.
The running title at the top of each page is in small rustic
capitals.[6] On the verso of each folio stands the word EPISTVLARVM;
on the recto of the following folio stands the number of the book,
_e.g._, LIB. II, LIB. III.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account