World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, American
“They see nothing but their propaganda.” That is a perfect description
of Monsieur Albert Thomas and all the other misguided idealists who
walk with blinders obscuring their eyes. They think and talk as though
unaware that the world around them was in flames.
On a battle-front of seventy-five miles our allied soldiers are
enduring such hardships, are performing such miracles of labor, are
suffering such wounds, such horrible mutilations, that no imagination
can compass the facts. Every day some of these heroic men give their
blood, their beautiful young lives for the freedom of the world.
They die for our liberty without a murmur. And while they are suffering
and dying, a whole section of the community in every allied country
continues to ignore them for one or another fatuous dream.
In France when these dreamers beat at the Chamber of Deputies to be
allowed to go to Stockholm, Clemenceau answered them: “I understand
your idealism, and I share it. But where we differ is that I am under
no illusion regarding the reality of facts.”
The only important fact in the world is that we are fighting the
greatest war in history, “in order that government of the people, for
the people, and by the people shall not perish from the earth.” Nothing
else matters. Nothing. Every other question is a side issue, something
to be considered and acted upon after we have won the war.
In this country we have our Bolsheviki who would take advantage of the
fact that our best beloved, our sons, are fighting, giving their lives
in a far land, to seize power for their “class.” We have fanatics whose
paranoia finds expression in “radical” magazines. We have propagandists
who find supreme satisfaction in going around the country making
defeatist speeches, and we have a public which exclaims in horror
when one of these talkers is arrested and given a well-merited prison
sentence.
We have lawmakers, men in Congress, whose devotion to their
propaganda is so limitless that they are willing to risk losing army
appropriations, delaying the progress of the war, in order to hasten a
little the prohibition campaign.
We have theorists who can not think very much about the war because
they are so occupied with getting on good terms again with a people
who never were honestly on good terms with anybody except themselves.
After all these years of slaughter these theorists would smilingly get
together with the men who willed the slaughter and talk about a league
of nations, a society to abolish war.
“A league of nations!” exclaimed Clemenceau to the Unified Socialists
of France, led by Albert Thomas. “What will a league of nations mean
without Germany? I for one will not let Germany in. You would do so,
and on what guarantees? Ask Belgium!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account