A Study of Siouan Cults: Eleventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1889-1890, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1861, pages 351-544Dorsey, James Owen
Religion
A Study of Siouan Cults: Eleventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1889-1890, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1861, pages 351-544
Dorsey, James Owen
Siouan Indians -- Religion
In the mind of a Dakota * * * this word Wah-kon (we write,
wa-kan) covers the whole field of their fear and worship. Many
things also that are neither feared nor worshiped, but are simply
wonderful, come under this designation. It is related of Hennepin
that when he and his two companions were taken captive by a Sioux
war party, as they ascended the upper Mississippi one of the men
took up his gun and shot a deer on the bank. The Indians said,
“Wah-kon chi?”--Is not this mysterious? And from that day
* * * the gun has been called Mah-za wah-kon, mysterious
iron. This is shortened into Mah-za-kon. The same thing we may
believe is true when, probably less than two centuries ago, they
first saw a horse. They said “Shoon-ka wah-kon,” wonderful dog.
And from that day the horse has been called by the Sioux
wonderful dog, except when it has been called big dog, Shoon-ka
tonka. These historical facts have satisfied us that the idea of
the Great Spirit ascribed to the Indians of North America does
not belong to the original theogony of the Sioux, but has come
from without, like that (sic) of the horse and gun, and probably
dates back only to their first hearing of the white man’s
God.[90]
_Taku Wakan._--This is a general term, including all that is wonderful,
incomprehensible, supernatural--what is wakan; but especially covering
the objects of their worship. Until used in reference to our God, it is
believed that the phrase was not applied to any individual object of
worship, but was equivalent to “the gods.”[91] As tuwe, _who_, refers
to persons, and taku, _what_, to things, the correctness of Riggs’s
conclusion can hardly be questioned, provided we add that the Dakota
term, Taku Wakan, could not have conveyed to the Dakota mind the idea
of a _personal_ God, using the term _person_ as it is commonly employed
by civilized peoples.
DAIMONISM.
§ 96. Lynd says:
The divinities of evil among the Dakotas may be called legion.
Their special delight is to make man miserable or to destroy him.
Demons wander through the earth, causing sickness and death.
Spirits of evil are ever ready to pounce upon and destroy the
unwary. Spirits of earth, air, fire, and water (see § 36) surround
him upon every side, and with but one great governing object in
view--the misery and destruction of the human race.[92]
ANIMISM.
§ 97. Their religious system gives to everything a soul or spirit. Even
the commonest sticks and clays have a spiritual essence attached to
them which must needs be reverenced; for these spirits, too, vent their
wrath upon mankind. Indeed, there is no object, however trivial, but
has its spirit.[93]
In his article on the Mythology of the Dakotas,[94] Riggs says of the
Dakota:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account