A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times — John Shaqi
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later timesPayne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
History
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times
Payne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
Bow and arrow; Engines of war; Military art and science -- History
For example, Varillas[38] writes that ‘at his ineffectual siege of
Carolstein in 1422, Coribut caused the bodies of his soldiers whom the
besieged had killed to be thrown into the town in addition to 2,000
cartloads of manure. A great number of the defenders fell victims to
the fever which resulted from the stench, and the remainder were only
saved from death by the skill of a rich apothecary who circulated in
Carolstein remedies against the poison which infected the town.’
[38] French historian, born 1624, died 1696.
Froissart tells us that at the siege of Auberoche, an emissary who came
to treat for terms was seized and shot back into the town. This author
writes:
‘To make it more serious, they took the varlet and hung the letters
round his neck and instantly placed him in the sling of an engine and
then shot him back again into Auberoche. The varlet arrived dead before
the knights who were there and who were much astonished and discomfited
when they saw him arrive.’
Another historian explains that to shoot a man from the sling of an
engine he must first be tied up with ropes, so as to form a round
bundle like a sack of grain.
The engine with which such fiendish deeds were achieved was the
trebuchet.
[Page 40]
A catapult was not powerful enough to project the body of a man. This
difficulty was overcome by cutting off the head of any unfortunate
emissary for peace, if the terms he brought were scornfully rejected.
His letter of supplication from the besieged was then nailed to his
skull, and his head was sent flying through space to fall inside the
town as a ghastly form of messenger conveying a refusal to parley.
As it was always an object to the besiegers of a town to start a
conflagration if they could, Greek fire was used for the purpose. The
flame of this fearfully destructive liquid, the composition of which
is doubtful, could not be quenched by water. It was placed in round
earthenware vessels that broke on falling, and which were shot from
catapults; as the roofs of ancient and mediæval dwelling-houses were
usually thatched, it of course dealt destruction when it encountered
such combustible material.
The successful attack or defence of a fortified town often depended on
which of the armies engaged had the more powerful balistas, catapults
or trebuchets, as one engine of superior range could work destruction
unimpeded if it happened that a rival of similar power was not
available to check its depredations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account