A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later timesPayne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
History
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times
Payne-Gallwey, Ralph, Sir
Bow and arrow; Engines of war; Military art and science -- History
It is beyond question that in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,
with bows precisely similar to the one shown in Fig. 1, but of much
greater power, flight arrows were shot from 600 to 800 yards by certain
famous Turkish archers.
The achievements of these celebrated bowmen were engraved on marble
columns erected at the ancient archery ground near Constantinople, and
these records are still in existence (p. 125).
[Page 120]
The only trustworthy evidence of unusual ranges attained with the
English longbow is as follows:
1798. Mr. Troward 340 yards.
1856. Mr. Horace Ford 308 „
1881. Mr. C. J. Longman 286 „
1891. Mr. L. W. Maxon 290 „
1897. Major Joseph Straker 310 „
It is not probable that the English bowmen of mediæval days were able
to shoot the arrows they used in warfare farther than from 230 to 250
yards. Nor is it likely that they could send flight arrows to longer
ranges than those given above, as heavy yew bows, strong as they may
have been, were unsuitable for the purpose.[49] It was from their great
elasticity, as much as from their strength, that composite bows derived
their wonderful power.
[49] In King Henry IV., Second Part, Act III., Scene 2,
Shakespeare makes Shallow exclaim of Double that the
latter could shoot a flight arrow from 280 to 290 yards.
In the time of Shakespeare (1564–1616) it was, therefore,
considered a notable feat to send an arrow to this
distance.
When, too, the composite bow was strung, its bow-string was much more
taut than was that of any European bow, as the latter was merely bent
out of a straight line, whilst the former was bent from a sharp reflex
curve, which it was always striving to resume when in use.
Though many nations formerly used composite bows of horn and sinew, no
people attained such dexterity in their manipulation, or constructed
them of such marvellous power and efficiency, and at the same time so
small, elegant and light, as did the Turks.
It should not be supposed, however, that because these bows were so
diminutive in size, they were mere playthings for shooting a flight
arrow to an immense range. They were powerful weapons of warfare, and,
as I have proved in practice, those of only moderate power are capable
of sending an iron-shod arrow weighing 5s., or one ounce, to a distance
of 280 yards. Bows that could shoot a flight arrow 600 yards, and more,
would certainly be able to drive an ounce arrow 360 to 400 yards--or
much farther than was possible with the old English longbow and its war
shaft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
A summary of the history, construction and effects in warfare of the projectile-throwing engines of the ancients, with a treatise on the structure, power and management of Turkish and other Oriental bows of mediæval and later times — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account