A supplementary report on the results of a special inquiry into the practice of interment in towns.Chadwick, Edwin
History
A supplementary report on the results of a special inquiry into the practice of interment in towns.
Chadwick, Edwin
Burial; Cemeteries -- Great Britain; Mortality -- Statistics; Public health -- Great Britain; Working class -- Great Britain
The occurrence of cases of instant death to grave-diggers, from
accidentally inhaling the concentrated miasma which escapes from
coffins, is undeniable. Slower deaths from exposure to such miasma are
designated as “low fevers,” and whether or not the constitutional
disturbances attendant on the exposure to the influence of such miasma
be or not the true typhus, it suffices as a case requiring a remedy,
that the exposure to that influence is apt to produce grievous and fatal
injuries amongst the public.
§ 9. Undertakers state that they sometimes experience, in particularly
crowded grave-yards, a sensation of faintness and nausea without
perceiving any offensive smell. Dr. Riecke appears to conclude, from
various instances which are given, that emanations from putrid remains
operate in two ways,—one set of effects being produced through the lungs
by impurity of the air from the mixture of irrespirable gases; the other
set, through the olfactory nerves by powerful, penetrating, and
offensive smells. On the whole, the evidence tends to establish the
general conclusion that offensive smells are true warnings of sanitary
evils to the population. The fact of the general offensiveness of such
emanations is adduced by Dr. Riecke also as evidence of their injurious
quality.
Another circumstance which must awaken in us distrust of putrid
emanations, is the powerful impression they make on the sense of
smell. It certainly cannot be far from the truth to call the organ
of smell the truest sentinel of the human frame. “Many animals,”
observes Rudolphi, “are entirely dependent on their sense of smell
for finding out food that is not injurious; where their smell is
injured they are easily deceived, and have often fallen a sacrifice
to the consequent mistakes.” Amongst all known smells, there is,
perhaps, no one which is so universally, and to such a degree
revolting to man, as the smell of animal decomposition. The roughest
savage, as well as the most civilized European, fly with equal
disgust from a place where the air is infected by it. If an instinct
ever can be traced in man, certainly it is in the present case: and
is instinct a superfluous monitor exactly in this one case? Can
instinct mislead just in this one circumstance? Can it ever be, that
the air which fills us with the greatest disgust, is the finest
elixir of life, as Dumoulins had the boldness to maintain in one of
his official reports. Hippolyte Cloquet, in his Osphrestologie has
attempted to throw some light on the effect of smell on the human
frame, and though we must entirely disregard many of the anecdotes
which he has blended into his inquiry, yet the result remains firmly
proved that odours in general exert a very powerful influence on the
health of men, and that all very acutely impressing smells are
highly to be suspected of possessing injurious properties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account