Free verse; Modernism (Literature); Poetry, Modern -- 20th century -- History and criticism
Richard Aldington, William Carlos Williams, Ezra Pound and Wallace
Stevens are the so-called authors of these poems. These might pass
as legitimate instances of correspondence and not be suspect as
parasitical inter-imitativeness, were any of the poems in themselves
of separate poetic importance; were not all of these poems, and many
more like them, closely dependent on one another--were they private
individuals and not members of an institution; and were not the
Imagist school, to which all of these poets at one time or another
belonged, a notoriously self-advertising institution. These things
being so, we are provoked to ask questions that we need not ask in the
case of legitimate instances of correspondence. Such as: who was the
inventor of the style of the first two pieces, Mr. Aldington or Mr.
Williams? or yet H.D. or F. S. Flint? Is not Mr. Williams at least
suspect for his later obvious imitation of T. S. Eliot, E. E. Cummings,
Edith Sitwell? Is not Mr. Aldington at least suspect as the husband of
H.D.? In the two last pieces who is responsible for the form? Who first
thought of imitating the Japanese _hokku_ form? Or rather who
first thought of imitating the French imitations of the _hokku_
form? Did Mr. Aldington suggest a slightly shorter poem to Mr. Stevens
or Mr. Pound or did Mr. Pound suggest a slightly longer poem to Mr.
Aldington, etc., or did Mr. Pound and Mr. Stevens and Mr. Aldington
and Mr. Williams decide, as mutual pairs, to work as a school team, or
did Mr. Williams and Mr. Stevens and Mr. Aldington and Mr. Pound pair
off, as being by nationality more pairable--Mr. Pound, a transplanted
American, counting as either English or French, as the need may be?...
These are questions to concern the curious dustman, but not the plain
reader, least of all the critic. The reader, even the critic, does not
have to trouble to plot out a literary chart, to develop a carefully
graded technical vocabulary. All that either of them needs is a simple
and instinctive recognition of the real, which is easily discovered
if all other personal or critical questions are brushed aside as
irrelevant.
When modernist poetry or what, not so long ago, passed for modernist
poetry, can reach the stage where the following:
PAPYRUS
Spring ...
Too long ...
Gongula ...
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account