A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 : $b Pathology and general diseases
History
A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 : $b Pathology and general diseases
Medicine -- Practice
To decide as to whether a room is well ventilated or not, some
standard of permissible impurity must be fixed, and this standard is
now usually taken to be, in a room occupied by human beings, that
condition of air which produces in a person having a normal sense of
smell, and who enters from the fresh air, a faint sensation of an odor
very slightly musty and unpleasant. Upon testing the air of such a
room, it will be found that the amount of carbonic acid impurity
present--that is, the excess of this acid over the amount in the
external air--will be between 2 and 3 parts in 10,000.
As the amount of carbonic acid in normal air varies from 2 to 5 parts
in 10,000 in different places, and in the same place at different
times, it is better to look to the carbonic acid impurity as above
defined rather than to the total amount of the acid found present, if
strict accuracy is desired; but usually the statement of Dr. Parkes is
correct, that the organic impurity of the air is not perceptible to
the senses until the total carbonic acid rises to the proportion of 6
parts in 10,000 volumes. When the carbonic acid reaches 9 parts in
10,000 the air is close, and when it exceeds 1 part in 1000 the air is
usually decidedly unpleasant. If we take 2 parts in 10,000 as the
permissible maximum of carbonic acid impurity, it follows that the
amount of fresh air which must be supplied and thoroughly distributed
for each person per hour is 3000 cubic feet. If 3 parts per 10,000 be
taken as the permissible maximum (which is the standard of
Pettenkofer), the amount of air per head per hour must be 2000 cubic
feet. While it is impossible, as Dr. Parkes remarks, to show by direct
evidence that the impurity indicated by 7, 8, or even 10, parts of
carbonic acid per 10,000 is injurious to health, it is advisable to
accept his standard, because it is a simple one, and can be
practically applied without special apparatus or technical skill, and
because there is evidence of the injury to health which continued
exposure to air impure, by this standard, ultimately produces.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account