A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 2 : $b General diseases (continued) and diseases of the digestive system
Science
A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 2 : $b General diseases (continued) and diseases of the digestive system
Medicine -- Practice
Purpura papulosa (lichen lividus, Willan) is a form of purpura where,
in the midst of ecchymoses, livid papules appear. These probably depend
upon a large amount of hemorrhage occurring within a limited space,
most often surrounding the orifices of hair-follicles, because these
are supplied with a capillary network that comes directly from the
deeper layer.[8] They are formed most abundantly on the legs of
scrofulous, cachectic persons who have purpura. Care must be taken to
distinguish this form of purpura from erythema multiforme and erythema
nodosum, where blood is usually extravasated secondarily into the
tissues. Those cases only where the purpura is primary should be
recognized as purpura papulosa.
[Footnote 8: Hebra, _Skin Diseases_, New Syd. Soc. Transact., ii. p.
425.]
The purpuric effusion appears to act as an irritant upon the tissues,
and to excite inflammation. Gangrene of the mucous coat of the
intestines has resulted from extensive hemorrhagic extravasations, and
from a similar cause cutaneous gangrene has been known. These
complications, however, are rare.
ETIOLOGY.--The immediate causes of purpura are quite unknown. Both
sexes and persons of every age are affected by it. While it is most
often seen in debilitated subjects, those in vigorous health possess no
immunity. It has often been observed during convalescence from other
maladies. It cannot be said that those who are miserably clothed, fed,
and lodged are especially predisposed to attacks of purpura. Between
purpura and hæmophilia, etiologically, there are many points of
difference. Purpura is not hereditary, nor is there a purpuric
diathesis in the strict sense of the term. Some persons, indeed, seem
to possess a {191} predisposition to the disease, and some authors
claim for purpura rheumatica a distinct annual type. This, however, is
not at all certain.
Recently it has been claimed that purpura hæmorrhagica depends upon the
presence of a minute organism in the blood. Petrone[9] injected blood
drawn from patients with this disease under the skin of rabbits,
producing widely-distributed hemorrhages. In the blood of these
individuals and of the injected rabbits micrococci and bacilli were
detected. Watson Cheyne[10] also describes a plugging of the
capillaries with bacilli. These were 1/7700 of an inch in length and
1/20000 of an inch in diameter, and were arranged in colonies. In
another case there were found micrococci arranged in chains. These
swarmed in the capillaries and some larger vessels, and sometimes
completely blocked them. Although an origin in infection has thus been
claimed for purpura hæmorrhagica, the fact that more than one variety
of micro-organism was observed cannot fail to excite suspicion of,
possibly, erroneous observation.
[Footnote 9: _Lo Sperimentale_, 51, 1883.]
[Footnote 10: _Lancet_, i., 1884, 344.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account