A Taxonomic Revision of the Leptodactylid Frog Genus Syrrhophus CopeLynch, John D.
Science
A Taxonomic Revision of the Leptodactylid Frog Genus Syrrhophus Cope
Lynch, John D.
Frogs; Syrrhophus
Smith and Taylor (1948) recognized seven species of the genus in eastern
Mexico. Firschein revised the eastern complex (as then understood), and
in so doing added one new species and treated _Syrrhophus verruculatus_
as a _nomen dubium_. Dixon (1957) redefined the related genus
_Tomodactylus_ and transferred _T. macrotympanum_ Taylor to the genus
_Syrrhophus_. Neill (1965) described a new subspecies of _S. leprus_
from British Honduras. Two species (_S. gaigeae_ and _S. marnockii_)
were recognized in Texas until Milstead, Mecham, and McClintock (1950)
synonymized _S. gaigeae_ with _S. marnockii_. Thus, at present, nine
species (one polytypic) are recognized on the eastern slopes and
lowlands from central Texas to British Honduras. These are currently
placed on one species group equivalent to the western complex reviewed
by Duellman (1958).
TABLE 1--Species Described as Members of the Genus _Syrrhophus_ but
Now Placed in Other Genera.
=======================================================================
Trivial name and author Current combination
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
_areolatus_ Boulenger, 1898 _Eleutherodactylus areolatus_
_calcaratus_ Andersson, 1945 _Eleutherodactylus anderssoni_
_caryophyllaceus_ Barbour, 1928 _Eleutherodactylus caryophyllaceus_
_coeruleus_ Andersson, 1945 _Eleutherodactylus coeruleus_
_ineptus_ Barbour, 1928 _Eleutherodactylus diastema_
_juninensis_ Shreve, 1938 _Eupsophus juninensis_
_lutosus_ Barbour and Dunn, 1921 _Eleutherodactylus lutosus_
_molinoi_ Barbour, 1928 _Eleutherodactylus molinoi_
_montium_ Shreve, 1938 _Niceforonia montia_
_mystaceus_ Barbour, 1922 _Eleutherodactylus rhodopis_
_obesus_ Barbour, 1928 _Eleutherodactylus punctariolus_
_omiltemanus_ Gunther, 1900 _Eleutherodactylus omiltemanus_[1]
_pardalis_ Barbour, 1928 _Eleutherodactylus pardalis_
=======================================================================
[1] New combination.
TABLE 2--Species Incorrectly Regarded as Members of the Genus _Syrrhophus_
but Described as Members of Other Genera.
==========================================================================
Trivial name, original generic
assignment, and author Current combination
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_chalceus_ (_Phyllobates_) Peters, 1873 _Eleutherodactylus chalceus_
_festae_ (_Paludicola_) Peracca, 1904 _Niceforonia festae_
_hylaeformis_ (_Phyllobates_) Cope, 1875 _Eleutherodactylus hylaeformis_
_palmatus_ (_Phyllobates_) Werner, 1899 _Colostethus palmatus_
_ridens_ (_Phyllobates_) Cope, 1866 _Eleutherodactylus ridens_
_simonsii_ (_Paludicola_) Boulenger, 1900 _Niceforonia simonsii_
==========================================================================
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account