A Text-Book of Horseshoeing, for Horseshoers and VeterinariansLungwitz, A. (Anton)
Science
A Text-Book of Horseshoeing, for Horseshoers and Veterinarians
Lungwitz, A. (Anton)
Horseshoeing
When the horny frog is ragged and fissured, and an ill-smelling,
dark-colored liquid collects in the lacunæ of the frog, it is affected
with thrush. When thrush exists uninterruptedly for several months the
perioplic band is irritated and forms rings of periople which assume an
irregular course and cross the rings of the middle layer of the wall
(Fig. 224).
[Illustration: FIG. 224. Hoof with irregular superficial rings
resulting from thrush of the frog.]
The _causes_: uncleanliness, =too little exercise= in fresh air,
excessive paring of the frog, and the use of shoes with calks by which
the frog is permanently removed from the ground.
The _consequences_ are, besides contraction of the hoof, soreness in
travelling, a shortening of the step, and, occasionally, well-marked
lameness.
_Treatment._—Removal of all greasy horn from the frog, and of the
prominent overgrown angles of the buttresses (see page 100), thorough
washing of the frog once or twice daily with a 5 per cent. creolin or
carbolic solution, =abundant exercise=, and shoes without calks.
CHAPTER X.
SHOEING MULES, ASSES, AND OXEN.
1. The shoeing of mules and asses is, as in the case of horses, a
necessity if these animals are to be used for draft or saddle purposes
on hard streets. The structure and characteristics of the hoofs of
these animals are quite similar to those of the horse, differing
chiefly in the form and thickness of the wall. The mule hoof is long
and narrow and round at the toe, the sole is well arched, and the side
walls are rather steep (Fig. 225). In the ass the narrowness of hoof
is still more pronounced, the wall is relatively =thick=, the frog is
particularly well developed in its branches, and therefore the hoof is
relatively wide in the region of the quarters. The horn of both mule
and ass is tough.
The shoes differ from those of the horse in no other respect than that
they should be lighter and narrower. Four nail-holes are sufficient for
an ass’ shoe, and five to six for a mule’s.
On account of the hardness and toughness of the walls, we use nails
that are short but strong in the shank; nails with weak shanks are apt
to bend in driving.
[Illustration: FIG. 225. A mule’s hoof. (Plantar surface).]
[Illustration: FIG. 226. A shod ox-claw.]
2. _The shoeing of oxen_ is essentially different from that of horses,
because the foot of the ox is cloven (split), the long pastern, short
pastern, and hoof-bone are double, so that, instead of one hoof or
claw, there are two upon each foot, distinguished as outer and inner.
Each claw consists of wall, sole, and bulbs; the frog is absent. The
wall is considerably thinner than that of the horse’s hoof, the sole is
thin, and the bulbs are low. For these reasons the shoe designed for a
claw must be thin, but wide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account