A thousand miles on an elephant in the Shan StatesHallett, Holt S. (Holt Samuel)
History
A thousand miles on an elephant in the Shan States
Hallett, Holt S. (Holt Samuel)
Laos -- Description and travel; Thailand -- Description and travel
“The slaves have poured out their complaints and deposited their
payments at the courts. He makes interest with the legal officers, and
has evaded receiving his money for more than three and four years. A
number of other persons also have poured forth their complaints of
wrongs received from his Satee (Chetty, a banker and money-lender)
Bahng Mew, and because he is wealthy he has confused the legal
officers.
“He has access also to princes and nobles, who support him in his
wrongs. This royal mandate is issued to be made known to the princes,
nobles, and Government officials within and without, forbidding all to
give him any further support in his practices. If they persist in
backing him up, they will no longer be objects of royal favour. Given,
Saturday, 1st of the waxing, 6th lunation, year of the Rabbit, 8th of
the decade, Siamese civil era, 1229 (May 4, 1867).”
Returning to the subject of gambling. The latest law dealing with it was
issued in 1794. In the previous reign an Act had been passed whereby the
gambling-house keepers were not allowed to advance money for gambling
purposes to the people. This caused a great falling off in the amounts
paid to Government for the monopolies. The law of 1794 states that—
“When his Majesty ascended the throne, having quelled all commotions,
he was graciously pleased to revise the laws. What it was befitting
should be retained, were left as before. What was not fitting, was
abrogated; but this (former) proclamation on gambling was not
repealed, because his Majesty was graciously disposed towards the
common people, who were biassed by avaricious desires, because the
managers of the gambling establishments trusted them and allowed them
to get into debt, even though they had not at their homes the means of
meeting their liabilities—still the managers trusted them; but they
did not think of their children and wives, but borrowed from the
managers, played, and were trusted. When their losses increased, and
the managers arrested them and enforced payment, they were obliged to
borrow, run in debt, sell their wives and children, and submit to many
hardships.
“With these facts in view that proclamation was allowed to stand, that
the players might play only to the extent of their means. At the
present time, however, the players have greatly diminished, have been
impoverished more than in former times, and the royal revenue has
diminished withal. The holders of the royal patents and the managers
of the gambling establishments perceive that there are no players, and
they fear they will not be able to meet their Government liabilities.”
Further on the Act goes on to state—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account